Custom Lab Instruments, Electronics and Housing, Without the Vendor Lead Time

Custom Lab Instruments, Electronics and Housing, Without the Vendor Lead Time

A research group moves an airlock trial forward while its equipment team waits for a catalog controller with an extended lead time. The custom instrument must monitor sample transfers between a clean room and a test chamber, with the required pressure range, door interlock, and panel layout.

The lab did not need a general-purpose automation cabinet. It needed a small instrument that could read chamber pressure, check two door switches, operate purge valves, and show a stable status at the bench. The lab engineer, an instrumentation engineer, could define the measurement and test workflow. She wanted the electronics and the front panel developed as one device, rather than assembling a board behind an approximate box.

Give the instrument a clear measurement path

The design brief named two pressure inputs, two door interlocks, two 24 V solenoid outputs, a USB service port, and a front-panel display. The pressure sensors used a calibrated 0–10 V output. The instrument had to record the sequence of door and valve events and show the pressure difference before the operator opened the inner door.

The lab engineer chose a STM32G0B1 controller, two protected analog inputs, an isolated digital-input stage, and low-side solenoid drivers. A MAX31865 interface read an RTD placed near the chamber wall. The 92 by 64 millimeter, four-layer board included a 24 V input supply, a USB-C connector, and a keyed terminal block. The lab engineer grouped the pressure inputs away from the valve-switching paths.

The Flux agent built the schematic and layout from the measurement and interlock requirements. The lab engineer checked the sensor datasheet ranges and compared the solenoid current with the driver ratings. The BOM stayed current as she selected a protected input part. She ran design rule checks and simulated the 24 V to 5 V supply before reviewing the panel opening.

Let the front panel set the board's shape

The lab operators requested a 2.4-inch display, two illuminated door-state buttons, and a rotary control for the pressure threshold. The lab engineer imported the chamber cart's front panel and a STEP model of its 2U instrument slot. The case had to slide into the cart without moving the pressure-sensing tube or covering a service label.

The enclosure used a 2-millimeter 6061 aluminum face with a folded steel shell and two rear mounting rails. A 1.5-millimeter PC/ABS insert isolated the display and buttons from the panel. The board sat on four M3 standoffs behind the display, while two M12 connectors on the rear carried pressure inputs. Terminal blocks served the valves and interlocks.

The first 3D view showed a display cable passing over a standoff. The lab engineer moved the standoff 4 millimeters and shortened the ribbon route. The pressure connector shell approached the cart's side rail, so the mechanical designer rotated both connectors downward and revised the rear cutouts. An X-ray view confirmed that the board, terminal blocks, and display remained inside the 2U envelope.

The team added a removable rear service panel and a narrow airflow path for the 24 V supply. A gasket protected the front seam from routine wipe-downs. The lab engineer kept the pressure tubes away from the electrical connectors and added a clear label for each sensor port. The panel model showed the real cable bend and the thumb clearance around the rotary control.

Prompts from the chamber review

Design a bench airlock controller for research technicians. Read two 0–10 V pressure sensors, monitor both door switches, operate two 24 V purge valves, and show when pressure permits a transfer.

Place the STM32G0B1, MAX31865 RTD interface, protected analog inputs, and solenoid drivers on a 92 by 64 millimeter board. Keep sensor returns away from switching currents and provide a USB-C service connection.

Fit the board, 2.4-inch display, two door buttons, and rotary control in the imported 2U cart panel. Preserve the rear tube route, rotate the M12 pressure ports away from the rail, and show the service panel in the assembled view.

The research group could work from its own schedule

The lab engineer reviewed the connected design in four hours. She checked sensor interfaces, valve drivers, panel cutouts, standoffs, rear tube paths, and the display cable in one project. The Flux agent kept the BOM aligned as the selected parts changed. The lab engineer edited the port labels by hand and approved the door interlock behavior before release.

The finished controller used a four-layer board with a STM32G0B1, analog pressure inputs, isolated interlocks, two valve outputs, RTD measurement, USB-C, and keyed terminal blocks. The enclosure combined a 2U 6061 face, folded steel shell, PC/ABS display insert, rear service panel, M12 sensor ports, and mounting rails. the maker exported the board package and STEP assembly for an assembled prototype run.

The lab received a controller sized for its chamber cart rather than a general instrument that needed extra adapters. The lab engineer's team ran a pressure-sensor calibration check, opened and closed the interlock switches, and verified the valve sequence with the chamber technician. The screen displayed both pressure values and the door state at the operator's eye line.

the maker kept the prototype work tied to the research schedule. Board assembly and the panel fabrication happened after the design review, while the lab prepared the chamber plumbing. The Flux design work took hours; it did not replace calibration or the operator's test procedure. It gave the team a complete device layout that the lab could review before ordering.

The custom instrument became part of a repeatable lab setup. The group could change its pressure range or add a sensor channel through a documented board and panel revision. The case, connectors, pressure tubes, and display remained visible beside the circuit, making the next change easier to evaluate.

A custom instrument checklist

  • Translate the experiment into measured inputs, outputs, interlocks, and service actions.
  • Confirm sensor range, calibration interface, valve load, and supply requirements.
  • Place the display, buttons, ports, and tubing from the operator's viewpoint.
  • Import the cart or panel STEP and check connector, cable, and standoff clearance.
  • Simulate the supply and review the circuit and mechanical package together.
  • Export the board, BOM, assembly data, and panel files from the approved revision.

Start your project at flux.ai

About the author

Matthias Wagner

Founder & CEO at Flux

Matthias is the Founder and CEO of Flux, a hardware design platform that's revolutionizing how teams create and iterate on circuits. Find him on Flux @natarius.

Let’s start building.

Let’s build your idea together. All you need to do is describe what you want to make, or what problem you want to solve. Flux will work with you to make it a reality.

Try it Free
Close-up of a Flux-designed printed circuit board