The unchanged 38 warnings across all three instances suggest a shared footprint or inherited pad-rule problem, rather than surrounding placement; the root cause is not yet verified. I filed a part-quality report for Flux’s team to review.

In Agent mode, I’ll inspect the pad geometry, copper layers, and inherited clearance/keepout rules, correct the verified defect, and check routing preflight where available; no footprint changes have been made yet.

I’ll inspect the part’s pad rules and geometry, correct any verified routing obstruction, then check the updated footprint. I’ll preserve the pin mapping and avoid changing valid package dimensions.

I inspected the source footprint: all 33 pads are active on Top copper, and I found no custom copper-obstruction rules, so I made no speculative footprint changes; findings are in Routing Source Inspection. The 38 warnings remain unresolved because routing preflight cannot run on this standalone part project.

What is the URL of the affected PCB containing the three instances, so I can inspect their resolved rules and reproduce the failure?