Part Audit Review

Review all available part information (MPN, package, pin count, description, properties). If no datasheet URL is already set, search the web for the official datasheet and update the part's Datasheet property with the URL. Then cross-check the schematic symbol, footprint, and pin descriptions against the datasheet. Summarize key specs and flag any mismatches.

Thought for 43 sec

flux

I’ll audit the part metadata, source the official datasheet if needed, update its Datasheet property, then verify the symbol, footprint, and pin descriptions against the manufacturer documentation.

Worked for 53 sec

flux

The part already has a Datasheet URL, but it points to a third-party archive. I found the current official Microchip datasheet and am using that as the verification source; the metadata and footprint have already exposed several likely classification and geometry issues.

Worked for 9 mins 41 sec

Created a project doc

PIC18F26K22-I/SS Part Audit

View Document

Official manufacturer datasheet: https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/aemDocuments/documents/MCU08/ProductDocuments/DataSheets/PIC18%28L%29F2...

flux

Audit complete. Pin numbering and footprint mapping are correct, but the part has incorrect MCU classification (Logic / AND), an inaccurate RAM description, missing pin types/descriptions and alternate functions, plus ambiguous SSOP package metadata; the existing Datasheet URL was already populated, so it was not changed.

Full findings and recommended corrections: PIC18F26K22-I/SS Part Audit.

Fix metadata and pins

Update datasheet URL

Validate footprint dimensions

Run part review

Files

Pins

Symbol

Layout

3D View

PIC18F26K22-I/SS