Part Audit Review


Review all available part information (MPN, package, pin count, description, properties). If no datasheet URL is already set, search the web for the official datasheet and update the part's Datasheet property with the URL. Then cross-check the schematic symbol, footprint, and pin descriptions against the datasheet. Summarize key specs and flag any mismatches.
I’ll audit the part metadata, source the official datasheet if needed, update its Datasheet property, then verify the symbol, footprint, and pin descriptions against the manufacturer documentation.
The part already has a Datasheet URL, but it points to a third-party archive. I found the current official Microchip datasheet and am using that as the verification source; the metadata and footprint have already exposed several likely classification and geometry issues.
Created a project doc
Audit complete. Pin numbering and footprint mapping are correct, but the part has incorrect MCU classification (Logic / AND), an inaccurate RAM description, missing pin types/descriptions and alternate functions, plus ambiguous SSOP package metadata; the existing Datasheet URL was already populated, so it was not changed.
Full findings and recommended corrections: PIC18F26K22-I/SS Part Audit.
Fix metadata and pins
Update datasheet URL
Validate footprint dimensions
Run part review

VSS_1
Pin Number
8
VDD
Pin Number
20
RC1
Pin Number
12
RB7/PGD
Pin Number
28
~MCLR~/VPP/RE3
Pin Number
1
RC5
Pin Number
16
RA6
Pin Number
10
RB0
Pin Number
21
RA7
Pin Number
9
RC0
Pin Number
11
RA0
Pin Number
2
RA5
Pin Number
7
RC7
Pin Number
18
RB6/PGC
Pin Number
27
RA1
Pin Number
3
RB3
Pin Number
24
RA2
Pin Number
4
RB1
Pin Number
22
VSS_2
Pin Number
19
RB2
Pin Number
23
RB5
Pin Number
26
RA3
Pin Number
5
RB4
Pin Number
25
RA4
Pin Number
6
RC3
Pin Number
14
RC2
Pin Number
13
RC4
Pin Number
15
RC6
Pin Number
17

PIC18F26K22-I/SS