Part Audit Review
Thought for 33 sec
Reorganized all 95 CMV2000-2E5M1LP terminals into seven datasheet-backed sections. Power is first, Ground last, and each section is evenly balanced left/right with unique terminal ordering.
- Pin Group removed from every terminal.
- No pins were renamed, replaced, renumbered, deleted, or remapped.
- All 95 package coordinates remain unchanged and unique.
- No unclear pin functions were found.
Official ams OSRAM DS000734 v8-00 shows principal ceramic LGA body outline 13.50 x 16.50 mm, but the Flux footprint fabrication/silkscreen outline is 13.50 x 18.65 mm and courtyard is correspondingly oversized.
check and correct if necessary according to the datasheet
check and correct if necessary according to the datasheet
Thought for 6 sec
I’ll verify the DS000734 v8-00 mechanical drawing and current footprint dimensions, then correct only the body-related fabrication, silkscreen, and courtyard geometry if the 18.65 mm extent is unsupported.
Worked for 7 mins 16 sec
The datasheet confirms 18.65 mm belongs to the µPGA lead-related overall extent, not the ceramic LGA body. I’ve corrected the footprint asset to the 13.50 × 16.50 mm body and retained its existing 1.00 mm courtyard margin; now I’m verifying the loaded footprint and all 95 pads.
Worked for 23 sec
Verification passed: the corrected asset contains 95 pads with the same grid, omitted A1, 0.300 mm lands, pin-1 marker, and STEP reference; only the body and courtyard Y extents changed.
Thought for 7 sec
Corrected the footprint per ams OSRAM DS000734 v8-00:
- F.Fab / F.SilkS: 13.50 × 16.50 mm
- F.CrtYd: 15.50 × 18.50 mm, retaining the original 1.00 mm margin
- Unchanged: all 95 pads, numbering/mapping, 1.27 mm grid, 0.300 mm lands, pin-1 marker, and STEP model
The 18.65 mm dimension applies to the µPGA lead-related extent, not the LGA ceramic body. I also filed a library part-quality report with Flux.
