Part Review Report
Review all available part information (MPN, package, pin count, description, properties). If no datasheet URL is already set, search the web for the official datasheet and update the part's Datasheet property with the URL. Then cross-check the schematic symbol, footprint, and pin descriptions against the datasheet. Summarize key specs and flag any mismatches.
Thought for 4 sec
I’ll review the part metadata, find and attach the official datasheet if needed, then compare symbol/footprint/pin descriptions against it and summarize any mismatches.
Worked for 45 sec
The part already has an ST datasheet URL set, so I’m using that as the reference and moving straight into pin/package verification.
Worked for 4 mins 1 sec
The pin-number/name mapping matches the ST UFQFPN48 pinout overall; I’m documenting the metadata and footprint issues I found so the detailed comparison stays in the project files.
Worked for 1 min 19 sec
Created a project doc
Part Review Report: STM32WL55CCU6
Date: 2026-07-13 Official datasheet already set on the part: https://www.st.com/resource/en/datasheet/stm32wl55cc.pdf
Review complete. The datasheet URL was already set to the official ST datasheet, so no Datasheet property update was needed; I created the detailed findings in Part Review Report: STM32WL55CCU6.
Key results: the 49-pin symbol/pin-number mapping matches the ST UFQFPN48 pinout, but metadata has issues: package is incorrectly set to
TO, all pin types are Unspecified, pin descriptions are missing, logic metadata appears wrong, and the footprint looks like a generic QFN pattern rather than the exact ST recommended UFQFPN48 land pattern. Suggested next step: ask me to apply the metadata/pin-description/footprint corrections.Fix metadata and footprint
Update part metadata
Populate pin descriptions
Correct footprint geometry
Run part checks
