Part Validation Review

flux

I’ll inspect the current part metadata, find and attach the official datasheet if needed, then compare symbol/footprint/pin data against the datasheet and report any mismatches.

flux

The part already has an Analog Devices datasheet URL set, so I’m using that as the reference and moving on to pin/package validation.
Created a project doc

MAXM86161AEFD+ Part Validation Review

View Document
Date: 2026-07-22 Official datasheet set on project: https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/maxm86161a.pdf

flux

Completed the part review and saved the detailed findings in MAXM86161AEFD+ Part Validation Review.
Open items:
  • Datasheet URL was already set to the official Analog Devices PDF; no update was needed.
  • Pinout and footprint geometry match the datasheet.
  • Main issues flagged: missing pin descriptions, all pin types set to Unspecified, and package metadata is underspecified as Module instead of 14-pin OLGA / F142A4-1.
Suggested next steps:
  1. Add datasheet-backed Pin Description values for all 14 terminals.
  2. Assign proper electrical pin types for ERC.
  3. Update package metadata to 14-pin OLGA, package code F142A4-1, land pattern 90-100106.
Fix metadata and review
Add pin descriptions
Assign pin types
Update package metadata
Run ERC DRC
Sign up to send

Files

Pins

Symbol

Layout

3D View

MAXM86161AEFD+