Part Validation Review


I’ll inspect the current part metadata, find and attach the official datasheet if needed, then compare symbol/footprint/pin data against the datasheet and report any mismatches.
The part already has an Analog Devices datasheet URL set, so I’m using that as the reference and moving on to pin/package validation.
Created a project doc

MAXM86161AEFD+ Part Validation Review

View Document

Completed the part review and saved the detailed findings in MAXM86161AEFD+ Part Validation Review.
Open items:
  • Datasheet URL was already set to the official Analog Devices PDF; no update was needed.
  • Pinout and footprint geometry match the datasheet.
  • Main issues flagged: missing pin descriptions, all pin types set to Unspecified, and package metadata is underspecified as Module instead of 14-pin OLGA / F142A4-1.
Suggested next steps:
  1. Add datasheet-backed Pin Description values for all 14 terminals.
  2. Assign proper electrical pin types for ERC.
  3. Update package metadata to 14-pin OLGA, package code F142A4-1, land pattern 90-100106.
Fix metadata and review
Add pin descriptions
Assign pin types
Update package metadata
Run ERC DRC

PGND
Pin Number
9
N.C._1
Pin Number
6
VLDO
Pin Number
4
N.C._2
Pin Number
7
VLED
Pin Number
5
SCL
Pin Number
2
GND_ANA
Pin Number
11
SDA
Pin Number
1
N.C._3
Pin Number
8
INTB
Pin Number
14
LDO_EN
Pin Number
3
GPIO
Pin Number
13
VREF
Pin Number
12
GND_DIG
Pin Number
10
Name
Pin #
Type
Part Type
Pin Orientation
Terminal Order
SDA
1
Unspecified
Terminal
SCL
2
Unspecified
Terminal
LDO_EN
3
Unspecified
Terminal
VLDO
4
Unspecified
Terminal
VLED
5
Unspecified
Terminal
N.C._1
6
Unspecified
Terminal
N.C._2
7
Unspecified
Terminal
N.C._3
8
Unspecified
Terminal
PGND
9
Unspecified
Terminal
GND_DIG
10
Unspecified
Terminal
Bottom
GND_ANA
11
Unspecified
Terminal
Bottom
VREF
12
Unspecified
Terminal
GPIO
13
Unspecified
Terminal
INTB
14
Unspecified
Terminal

MAXM86161AEFD+