Part Review Check

C

cherepanyadima

Review all available part information (MPN, package, pin count, description, properties). If no datasheet URL is already set, search the web for the official datasheet and update the part's Datasheet property with the URL. Then cross-check the schematic symbol, footprint, and pin descriptions against the datasheet. Summarize key specs and flag any mismatches.

flux

I’ll inspect the current part metadata and geometry, find the official datasheet if needed, update the Datasheet property if missing, then compare symbol/footprint/pins against the source and summarize any mismatches.

flux

The part already has a datasheet URL set, so I’m using that for extraction; I’m also checking public/library references to validate whether it matches the official E-Switch documentation.
Created a project doc

Part Review - 800SP9B6M2RE

View Document
Date: 2026-07-22 Reviewed available part information for the published Flux part project 800SP9B6M2RE, including project metadata, schematic...

flux

Completed the part review and wrote the detailed findings to Part Review - 800SP9B6M2RE.
Open items:
  • Datasheet URL was already set, so I did not overwrite it.
  • Main flag: verify/explicitly set the footprint drill size to Ø1.09 mm.
  • Minor cleanup: set pins to Passive, add pin descriptions, and set Part Type to Switch if editable.
Suggested next steps:
  1. Update the footprint drill/hole size if it is not explicitly Ø1.09 mm.
  2. Clean up pin metadata for terminals 1 and 3.
  3. Re-run a footprint/manufacturing check after metadata/footprint cleanup.
Fix metadata and footprint
Set drill size
Clean pin metadata
Set Part Type
Run checks
Sign up to send

Files

Pins

Symbol

Layout

3D View

800SP9B6M2RE