Audit complete. I added the official Vishay datasheet URL: https://www.vishay.com/docs/77128/sqj128elp.pdf.

No pin or geometry changes were made. I filed a part-quality report for the critical mapping and asset issues.

I’ll re-check the manufacturer’s pin diagram and distinguish physical left-to-right orientation from actual pad numbers; the image may reveal that my earlier interpretation was wrong.

I’m checking the official top-view numbering against the current pad order now.

The rendered datasheet drawing confirms the earlier claim was wrong: its bottom-view row is 4=G, 3=S, 2=S, 1=S, matching your image’s top-view left-to-right S, S, S, G.

You’re right to question it—my earlier pin-swap finding was incorrect.

The datasheet package drawing confirms:

The datasheet’s bottom view reads left-to-right 4=G, 3=S, 2=S, 1=S. In your shown top view, that becomes left-to-right 1=S, 2=S, 3=S, 4=G, exactly as drawn.

Therefore, the current symbol and footprint pin assignments are correct. I apologize for the earlier orientation error.