I reviewed the datasheet and concluded that your finding is incorrect, as the drawing clearly shows three holes with a 1.7 mm diameter. Please re-check the datasheet and update the audit accordingly.
You’re right to challenge that finding. I’ll re-read the drawing’s hole callout, compare it directly with the three signal-pad drill sizes, and correct the audit record and any related issue report.
Part AuditMR30PW-M — corrected reviewFootprint geometry
Pads 1, 2, and 3: Ø1.70 mm drilled holes with Ø2.55 mm copper pads.
Contact pitch: 3.50 mm between adjacent electrical contacts.
MH1 and MH2: Ø1.00 mm drilled mechanical mounting holes.
Conclusion: The three electrical contact-hole diameters match the manufacturer drawing. The previous finding that Ø1.90 mm holes were required was incorrect and is withdrawn. The comparison had relied on a third-party footprint rather than the MR30PW-M drawing.
Remaining audit flags
Package metadata value TO is not appropriate for this through-hole power connector.
Electrical pins and mounting holes lack clear pin descriptions/types; MH1 and MH2 should be identified as mechanical.
You are correct. The drawing specifies 3 × Ø1.7 mm contact holes, and pads 1–3 use 1.70 mm drills, so the footprint matches. The previous Ø1.9 mm mismatch finding is withdrawn.
I recorded the corrected conclusions in the Part Audit. The remaining metadata, pin-description, and 3D-model flags are unchanged.