Part Audit Review


Review all available part information (MPN, package, pin count, description, properties). If no datasheet URL is already set, search the web for the official datasheet and update the part's Datasheet property with the URL. Then cross-check the schematic symbol, footprint, and pin descriptions against the datasheet. Summarize key specs and flag any mismatches.
I’ll audit the part metadata, locate the official datasheet if needed, verify the symbol/footprint/pins against it, and document any mismatches or corrections.
I’m reading the current metadata, terminal definitions, rendered symbol, and PCB land pattern now; next I’ll compare them to the manufacturer package drawing and pin table.
Created a project doc

Part Audit Report

View Document

Part Audit Report Scope
Audit of the published MAX17301G+ part metadata, schematic symbol terminals, PCB footprint, and available manufacturer documentation.
Authoritative sources Current part information Key specifications
  • Function: Stand-alone pack-side 1-cell Li-ion/Li-polymer ModelGauge m5 EZ fuel gauge with 2-level protector.
Audit complete. The official Analog Devices datasheet URL was already set, and all 14 lead names/numbers plus the exposed pad match; however, the description incorrectly claims self-discharge detection, terminal descriptions/types are missing, and package metadata is incomplete. The exposed-pad paste pattern also remains unverified because ADI land-pattern drawing 90-0063 was unavailable.
Full findings and specifications: Part Audit Report.
Fix and verify part
Correct part metadata
Populate terminal properties
Verify exposed-pad stencil
Rerun part review

PFAIL
Pin Number
4
PCKP
Pin Number
11
EP
Pin Number
15
SDA/DQ
Pin Number
8
CSP
Pin Number
5
CSN
Pin Number
6
BATT
Pin Number
3
CHG
Pin Number
14
SCL/OD
Pin Number
9
DIS
Pin Number
12
ZVC
Pin Number
13
TH
Pin Number
1
REG
Pin Number
7
ALRT/PIO
Pin Number
10
CP
Pin Number
2
Part Audit Report
Scope
Audit of the published MAX17301G+ part metadata, schematic symbol terminals, PCB footprint, and available manufacturer documentation.
Authoritative sources
Current part information

Table


FieldCurrent valueAssessment
MPNMAX17301G+Correct
ManufacturerAnalog DevicesCorrect (device originated under Maxim Integrated)
Description1-Cell ModelGauge m5 EZ Fuel Gauge with Protector, Internal Self-Discharge Detection and SHA-256 AuthenticationPartially incorrect: internal self-discharge detection is listed for MAX17300/MAX17310 only, not MAX17301G+
Datasheet URLhttps://www.analog.com/MAX17301/datasheetPresent and official; no update required
Package metadataNo explicit Package or Case Code property foundMissing; should identify 14 TDFN-EP, 3 mm x 3 mm, package code T1433+2C
Terminal/pad count15 terminal objects / 15 copper padsPhysically appropriate when counted as 14 perimeter leads plus exposed pad; should not be described as a 15-pin package
Part type / electrical metadataTerminal objects are Unspecified; no meaningful pin types/descriptions/groupsIncomplete
Key specifications
  • Function: Stand-alone pack-side 1-cell Li-ion/Li-polymer ModelGauge m5 EZ fuel gauge with 2-level protector.
  • Authentication: SHA-256 with a 160-bit secret key and unique 64-bit ID.
  • Interface: I2C for MAX17301G+; multifunction pins retain family naming such as SDA/DQ and SCL/OD.
  • Recommended operating VBATT: 2.3 V to 4.9 V.
  • Operating temperature: -40 C to +85 C.
  • Typical supply current: 24 uA active, 18 uA hibernate; lower-current ship/deep-ship modes are available.
  • Measurement: 78.125 uV voltage resolution; current-sense input range +/-51.2 mV and 1.5625 uV resolution.
  • Package: 14-lead TDFN-EP, 3.0 mm x 3.0 mm x 0.75 mm nominal, 0.40 mm pitch, package code T1433+2C.
  • Package exposed pad: 1.70 mm x 2.30 mm nominal package metal; connect EP to CSP for normal operation.
Pinout cross-check
All current pin numbers and names match the TDFN pin table:

Table


PinCurrent nameDatasheet function summaryResult
1THExternal thermistor connectionMatch
2CPCharge-pump output; bypass to BATTMatch
3BATTBattery supply and voltage-sense inputMatch
4PFAILOptional permanent-failure indicatorMatch
5CSPSense-resistor positive input and TDFN IC groundMatch
6CSNSense-resistor negative inputMatch
7REG1.8 V regulator outputMatch
8SDA/DQOpen-drain serial data I/OMatch
9SCL/ODI2C clock input / family 1-Wire speed selectionMatch
10ALRT/PIOActive-low open-drain alert / pushbutton wakeupMatch
11PCKPPack-positive terminal sensingMatch
12DISDischarge N-FET controlMatch
13ZVCZero-volt charge recovery configurationMatch
14CHGCharge N-FET controlMatch
EPEPExposed pad; connect to CSPMatch
Symbol deficiencies
  • Every terminal has Pin Type = Unspecified.
  • Pin Description is missing for every terminal.
  • Pin Group, Section, orientation metadata, and terminal order are not populated as semantic properties.
  • The symbol geometry and left/right grouping are readable, but the absent electrical types reduce ERC usefulness.
  • Suggested electrical classifications include: TH input; CP/REG power outputs; BATT power input; CSP/EP ground; CSN analog input; SDA/DQ bidirectional open-drain; SCL/OD input; ALRT/PIO open-drain/bidirectional multifunction; PFAIL output; PCKP analog input; DIS/CHG outputs; ZVC input.
Footprint cross-check
Confirmed matches
  • 14 perimeter pads plus one exposed pad.
  • 0.40 mm lead pitch.
  • 3 mm x 3 mm body outline.
  • Pin-1 marker and top-view numbering sequence are consistent: pins 1-7 run up the left side and pins 8-14 run down the right side.
  • Perimeter copper pads are 0.20 mm wide x 0.75 mm long, a plausible land pattern for the 0.20 +/-0.05 mm package leads.
  • Exposed copper pad is 1.80 mm x 2.40 mm, 0.10 mm larger in each axis than the nominal 1.70 mm x 2.30 mm package exposed metal, which is a plausible solder land allowance.
Risks / unverified details
  • The exposed pad currently uses one solid 1.80 mm x 2.40 mm paste aperture. Large exposed pads commonly require a segmented/reduced paste pattern to limit float and voiding. The official 90-0063 land-pattern drawing was unavailable at the tested public URL, so the exact Analog Devices paste recommendation could not be confirmed.
  • The footprint file description says T1433+2C, while the package outline drawing uses T1433-2C; the datasheet states suffix symbols indicate RoHS status and the drawing still applies, so this is not a geometry mismatch.
  • Courtyard is 4.25 mm x 3.60 mm. No mismatch was established, but it was not compared against the unavailable official land-pattern drawing.
Mismatches and priority
  1. High — Incorrect description: MAX17301G+ should not claim internal self-discharge detection; that feature is specified for MAX17300/MAX17310 only.
  2. Medium — Missing terminal descriptions/types: Pin names and numbers are correct, but all 15 terminals lack datasheet-backed descriptions and meaningful electrical types, weakening ERC and reuse quality.
  3. Medium — Missing package property: Add Package or Case Code = 14 TDFN-EP, 3 mm x 3 mm, T1433+2C or the closest canonical package value supported by the property system.
  4. Low/medium — EP paste pattern requires confirmation: The solid paste aperture may differ from the manufacturer-recommended stencil pattern; verify against land-pattern drawing 90-0063 or assembly-house guidance before production.
  5. Informational — Pin-count wording: The device is a 14-lead package with an exposed pad, although the Flux footprint correctly contains 15 electrical/copper pad objects.
Overall assessment
The MPN, manufacturer, official datasheet link, package family, footprint pitch, pad numbering, and complete logical pin-name mapping are correct. The part needs metadata cleanup—especially removal of the unsupported self-discharge claim and addition of pin descriptions/electrical types—before it should be considered a high-quality reusable library part. The footprint appears dimensionally plausible, but the EP stencil pattern remains unverified because the referenced official land-pattern document was not publicly accessible at the tested URL.
  • Scope

  • Authoritative sources

  • Current part information

  • Key specifications

  • Pinout cross-check

  • Symbol deficiencies

  • Footprint cross-check

  • Confirmed matches

  • Risks / unverified details

  • Mismatches and priority

  • Overall assessment