Part Datasheet Audit
Review all available part information (MPN, package, pin count, description, properties). If no datasheet URL is already set, search the web for the official datasheet and update the part's Datasheet property with the URL. Then cross-check the schematic symbol, footprint, and pin descriptions against the datasheet. Summarize key specs and flag any mismatches.
Thought for 6 sec
I’ll audit the part metadata, locate the official Panasonic datasheet if needed, then cross-check the symbol, footprint, and pin definitions and update the Datasheet property.
Worked for 6 mins 26 sec
Audit complete. The official Panasonic datasheet URL was already populated, so no update was needed.
Key issues flagged:
- Capacitance is incorrectly recorded as 330 F; correct value is 330 µF.
- Pin descriptions/types and explicit +/− polarity mapping are missing.
- Footprint appears to have the correct 10 mm diameter and 5 mm pitch, but polarity marking is unclear.
- Panasonic sources conflict on length and performance: 20 vs 25 mm, 1.89 vs 2.15 A ripple, and 23 vs 22 mΩ impedance.
- Confirmed: 50 V, ±20%, −40 to +105°C, radial THT, 2 pins, 10,000-hour endurance.
I filed an internal part-quality report covering the metadata, polarity, and datasheet-revision discrepancies.
Fix metadata and polarity
Fix capacitance metadata
Add pin polarity
Improve polarity marking
Check datasheet discrepancy
