Part Datasheet Review


I’ll inspect the part metadata, find the official datasheet if needed, update the Datasheet property only if it’s missing, then compare symbol/footprint/pin info against the datasheet and report any mismatches.
I found and added the official TE datasheet URL; now I’m checking the two-pad symbol and KiCad footprint against TE’s product data/drawing.
Created a project doc

Part Review - TE Connectivity 2292838-3

View Document

Reviewed available part information for the published Flux part project 2292838-3, searched for the official datasheet when none was present...
I created the detailed part review file with the source links, footprint comparison, and mismatch notes: Part Review - TE Connectivity 2292838-3.
Updated the part’s Datasheet URL to the official TE Connectivity datasheet and completed the symbol/footprint review. Full details are in Part Review - TE Connectivity 2292838-3.
Open items:
  • Symbol has two passive terminals for what TE documents as one conductive spring contact body; pin descriptions are missing.
  • Pad 1_2 height should be visually rechecked against TE’s customer drawing because it may use the 1.0 mm body width rather than the 0.78 mm land/metal-mask dimension.
Suggested next steps:
  1. Add clear pin descriptions for 1_1 and 1_2.
  2. Verify pad 1_2 against the official drawing image.
  3. Add structured ratings: 1.5 A, 10 VDC, −40 °C to +85 °C.
Fix symbol and ratings
Fix pin descriptions
Verify pad geometry
Add structured ratings
Run part review

Name
Pin #
Type
Section
Pin Group
Orientation
Order
Sub-symbol
1
1_1
Passive
1
1_2
Passive

2292838-3