Part Audit Review
Review all available part information (MPN, package, pin count, description, properties). If no datasheet URL is already set, search the web for the official datasheet and update the part's Datasheet property with the URL. Then cross-check the schematic symbol, footprint, and pin descriptions against the datasheet. Summarize key specs and flag any mismatches.
Thought for 5 sec
I’ll audit the part metadata and geometry, locate the official datasheet if needed, update its Datasheet property, then report verified specs and any symbol/footprint mismatches.
Worked for 5 mins 31 sec
Created a project doc
Part Audit Report
Part Audit Report
Identification
- Manufacturer: Phoenix Contact
- Manufacturer part number / item number: 1923869
- Product designation: MSTBA 2,5 HC/ 2-G-5,08
- Type: 2-position, single-row, male PCB header; COMBICON MSTB 2,5 HC family
- Mounting: Through-hole, wave soldering
- Pitch: 5.08 mm
- Pin count: 2
- Official datasheet: https://www.phoenixcontact.com/en-gb/products/pcb-header-mstba-25-hc-2-g-508-1923869?type=pdf
The official datasheet URL was added to the part-level Datasheet URL property.
Existing part information reviewed
The project has manufacturer name, MPN, datasheet URL, and designator prefix metadata. The schematic consists of two passive terminals, numbered
01 and 02. The footprint is PHOENIX_1923869.kicad_mod, with ...Audit complete. I added the official Phoenix Contact datasheet URL and documented the full review in Part Audit Report.
The symbol and footprint are broadly correct; flagged issues are missing pin descriptions,
J versus P prefix metadata, and a datasheet extraction ambiguity between 5.00 mm pin spacing and the clearly specified 5.08 mm product pitch.Fix metadata issues
Verify footprint spacing
Normalize part metadata
Review 3D alignment
Refine this doc
Ask about this doc
Part Audit Report
Identification
- Manufacturer: Phoenix Contact
- Manufacturer part number / item number: 1923869
- Product designation: MSTBA 2,5 HC/ 2-G-5,08
- Type: 2-position, single-row, male PCB header; COMBICON MSTB 2,5 HC family
- Mounting: Through-hole, wave soldering
- Pitch: 5.08 mm
- Pin count: 2
- Official datasheet: https://www.phoenixcontact.com/en-gb/products/pcb-header-mstba-25-hc-2-g-508-1923869?type=pdf
The official datasheet URL was added to the part-level Datasheet URL property.
Existing part information reviewed
The project has manufacturer name, MPN, datasheet URL, and designator prefix metadata. The schematic consists of two passive terminals, numbered
01 and 02. The footprint is PHOENIX_1923869.kicad_mod, with a matching Phoenix Contact STEP model.The part name, descriptive product text, package dimensions, pin count, and contact details are represented by the project/part content and assets, but are not all exposed as explicit editable project properties.
Key datasheet specifications
Table
| Parameter | Official value |
|---|---|
| Positions / connections / potentials | 2 / 2 / 2 |
| Rows | 1 |
| Pitch | 5.08 mm |
| Nominal current | 16 A, subject to derating curve |
| Nominal voltage | 320 V |
| Rated voltage, II/2 | 630 V |
| Rated surge voltage | 4 kV |
| Contact resistance | 0.9 mΩ |
| Operating temperature | -40 °C to +105 °C, dependent on derating |
| Housing material / rating | PA, UL 94 V-0 |
| Contact material | Tin-plated copper alloy |
| Width | 12.16 mm |
| Length | 12 mm |
| Height | 11.8 mm |
| Installed height | 8.57 mm |
| Solder pin length | 3.23 mm |
| Pin cross-section | 1 mm × 1 mm |
| Recommended PCB hole diameter | 1.4 mm |
The connector has no switching capability under IEC 61984 and should not be mated or unmated while energized or under load.
Symbol cross-check
- Pin count: Correct — two terminals.
- Pin numbering: Correct —
01and02, matching the two positions and footprint pads. - Electrical type: Correct — both contacts are passive.
- Pin descriptions: Incomplete. The terminals have no useful human-readable descriptions beyond passive type and number. Suggested descriptions are
Contact 1 — male PCB header pinandContact 2 — male PCB header pin. - Prefix consistency: The part-level designator prefix is
J, while terminal-levelDesignator Prefixproperties showP. This does not change the electrical pin mapping, but it is inconsistent metadata and may confuse future maintenance.
Footprint cross-check
Table
| Feature | Footprint | Datasheet | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pad count | 2 | 2 | Match |
| Pad numbering | 01, 02 | positions 1, 2 | Match |
| Hole diameter | 1.4 mm | 1.4 mm | Match |
| Pad size | 2.1 mm × 2.1 mm | Not explicitly specified as a land diameter | Plausible; no mismatch established |
| Body outline width | 12.16 mm | 12.16 mm | Match |
| Body outline depth | 12.0 mm | 12.0 mm | Match |
| Pad center spacing | 5.08 mm | Product pitch 5.08 mm; OCR PCB-design field reports 5.00 mm | Needs drawing-level confirmation |
| Pin-1 marking | Rectangular pad and marker | Position identification expected | Appropriate |
Dimensional ambiguity
The official PDF identifies the product pitch as 5.08 mm, matching the footprint pad spacing and the MPN suffix. However, its OCR-extracted “PCB design” text reports 5.00 mm pin spacing. This appears internally inconsistent and may be an OCR/table-label issue. The footprint’s 5.08 mm spacing is strongly supported by the product designation and stated pitch, but the actual dimensional drawing should be visually checked before release if mating/assembly tolerance is critical.
Flagged mismatches and quality issues
- Missing terminal descriptions — symbol terminals are electrically valid but poorly documented.
- Designator-prefix inconsistency — part-level
Jversus terminal-levelPmetadata. - Pitch field ambiguity in the official PDF extraction — footprint is 5.08 mm; one extracted PCB-design field says 5.00 mm, while the official pitch and product designation say 5.08 mm.
- Package/case and key ratings are not all explicit structured properties — important details exist in the part content/datasheet but are not fully normalized into metadata fields.
Overall assessment
The symbol pin count, numbering, passive types, through-hole geometry, hole diameter, and body outline are consistent with Phoenix Contact 1923869. No definite manufacturability-breaking footprint error was found. The main actionable cleanup is improving terminal descriptions and resolving the prefix metadata inconsistency; the only dimensional concern is the datasheet’s conflicting extracted 5.00 mm versus 5.08 mm spacing text.
Identification
Existing part information reviewed
Key datasheet specifications
Symbol cross-check
Footprint cross-check
Dimensional ambiguity
Flagged mismatches and quality issues
Overall assessment
