Review all available part information (MPN, package, pin count, description, properties). If no datasheet URL is already set, search the web for the official datasheet and update the part's Datasheet property with the URL. Then cross-check the schematic symbol, footprint, and pin descriptions against the datasheet. Summarize key specs and flag any mismatches.
I’ll audit the part metadata and geometry, locate the official datasheet if needed, update its Datasheet property, then report verified specs and any symbol/footprint mismatches.
The official datasheet URL was added to the part-level Datasheet URL property.
Existing part information reviewed
The project has manufacturer name, MPN, datasheet URL, and designator prefix metadata. The schematic consists of two passive terminals, numbered 01 and 02. The footprint is PHOENIX_1923869.kicad_mod, with ...
Audit complete. I added the official Phoenix Contact datasheet URL and documented the full review in Part Audit Report.
The symbol and footprint are broadly correct; flagged issues are missing pin descriptions, J versus P prefix metadata, and a datasheet extraction ambiguity between 5.00 mm pin spacing and the clearly specified 5.08 mm product pitch.
I reviewed the datasheet again, and it clearly specifies a 5.08 mm spacing between the holes, which matches the value in Flux; therefore, the previous audit finding is incorrect—please re-check it and update the audit accordingly.
You’re correct—the datasheet confirms 5.08 mm hole spacing, matching the Flux footprint. I withdrew the incorrect 5.00 mm ambiguity and updated the Part Audit Report; no pitch mismatch remains.