Chat

Welcome to Flux

Treat Flux like your intern. Tell it what you'd like to build and it'll get to work. You can also ask it questions, brainstorm ideas, and teach it your preferences. Learn More

Explain project
Write a project description
Find schematic issues
Create a test plan
Simulate a circuit
Prepare for Manufacturing
Component Selection Workflow
New Subsystem Wizard

Ready.


if I have a 220 ohm resistor connected to a 5v supply to light an LED, whats the...

@copilot if I have a 220 ohm resistor connected to a 5v supply to light an LED, whats the current ?
1y
To find the current through the resistor and LED, you can use Ohm's Law:
$ I = \frac{V}{R} $
where:
  • $ I $ is the current,
  • $ V $ is the voltage across the resistor,
  • $ R $ is the resistance.
In this case, we need to account for the forward voltage drop of the LED (let's assume a typical forward voltage of 2V for a common red LED).
Therefore, the voltage across the resistor $ V_R $ is:
VR=VsupplyVLED=5V2V=3VV_R = V_{supply} - V_{LED} = 5V - 2V = 3V
Now, applying Ohm's Law:
I=VRR=3V220ΩI = \frac{V_R}{R} = \frac{3V}{220 \Omega}
Let's calculate that:
I=0.0136 A=13.6 mAI = 0.0136 \text{ A} = 13.6 \text{ mA}
So, the current through the 220-ohm resistor and the LED would be approximately 13.6 mA.
1y
11
HCPL2731M is this a good option for an optocoupler for an ESC? can i connect it ...

@copilot HCPL2731M is this a good option for an optocoupler for an ESC? can i connect it to an stm32 and feed it with 3.3v and in the other end connect it to a gate driver?
1y
The HCPL2731M is a high-speed optocoupler designed for use in interfacing digital logic to peripheral devices or microcomputers, especially where high speed, isolation, and reliability are required. It's a dual-channel optocoupler, featuring a high-speed integrated photodetector and a gallium arsenide infrared emitting diode. This makes it suitable for a variety of applications, including systems that need isolation like electrically noisy environments found in electronic speed controllers (ESCs) for motors.
Given your application—connecting an STM32 microcontroller to a gate driver within an ESC context—the HCPL2731M presents a good option due to its:
  • High isolation voltage (typically 3750 Vrms), ensuring safety and noise immunity between the low-voltage control side (STM32) and the high-voltage power side (gate driver).
  • Fast switching times, which are beneficial for the rapid modulation needed in ESC applications.
  • Compatibility with low supply voltage, as it can operate at 3.3V on the input side, matching the output logic level of an STM32 microcontroller.
  • Dual-channel design, providing flexibility if you need to control two gates or wish to have a redundant channel for reliability.
Connection Suggestions
To connect the STM32 to the HCPL2731M and then to a gate driver, you can follow these general guidelines:
STM32 to HCPL2731M
  • Connect the output GPIO pin (configured as an open-drain or push-pull output) of the STM32 to one of the input pins (Anode and Cathode) of the HCPL2731M.
    • Example configuration: Connect STM32:GPIOx to HCPL2731M:ANODE1 and HCPL2731M:CATHODE1 to STM32:GND.
  • Ensure the HCPL2731M input side has a suitable current-limiting resistor to protect the LED within the optocoupler. The resistor value depends on your supply voltage (3.3V in your case) and the LED's forward voltage and current.
    • Assumption: Using a typical forward voltage ($V_F$) of 1.2V and desired current ($I_F$) of 10mA, the resistor value ($R$) can be calculated using Ohm's Law $R = \frac{V_{supply} - V_F}{I_F}$.
    • Given $V_{supply} = 3.3V$, $R = \frac{3.3V - 1.2V}{10mA} = 210\Omega$. A standard value of $220\Omega$ is suitable.
HCPL2731M to Gate Driver
  • Connect one of the output pins of the HCPL2731M (Collector and Emitter of the phototransistor) to the input pin of the gate driver, ensuring that the gate driver's logic level and current requirements are compatible with the HCPL2731M's output.
    • Example configuration: Connect HCPL2731M:COLLECTOR1 to Gate Driver:IN and HCPL2735M:EMITTER1 to GND or the negative power supply of the gate driver circuit, depending on its design requirements.
  • The gate driver's Vcc should be connected to the appropriate power supply, ensuring it matches the gate driver's requirements for driving the gates of MOSFETs or IGBTs in your ESC.
With these connections, you can provide electrical isolation between the microcontroller and the gate driver, protecting your microcontroller from high voltages and noise, which are common in ESC environments.
Remember to review the HCPL2731M datasheet for specific details about input LED current, forward voltage, and output collector-emitter voltage ratings to ensure compatibility with your specific gate driver and microcontroller setup. Adjust the resistor value for the LED current limiting as necessary based on actual component specifications and operating conditions.
1y
8
Suppose this is a 20mA forward current, 2.1V forward voltage, what resistor valu...

@copilot Suppose this is a 20mA forward current, 2.1V forward voltage, what resistor value should I use if VCC is 3.3V coming from a STM32
1y
To determine the appropriate resistor value needed to limit the current to 20mA for the diode ($D1$), you can use Ohm's Law:
VR=VCCVFV_{\text{R}} = V_{\text{CC}} - V_{\text{F}}
R=VRIFR = \frac{V_{\text{R}}}{I_{\text{F}}}
Where:
  • $V_{\text{CC}}$ is the supply voltage (3.3V)
  • $V_{\text{F}}$ is the forward voltage of the diode (2.1V)
  • $I_{\text{F}}$ is the forward current (0.02A)
  1. Calculate the voltage drop across the resistor $V_{\text{R}}$:
VR=3.3V2.1V=1.2VV_{\text{R}} = 3.3V - 2.1V = 1.2V
  1. Calculate the resistor value $R$:
R=1.2V0.02A=60ΩR = \frac{1.2V}{0.02A} = 60 \Omega
So you should use a 60 ohm resistor to limit the current to 20mA.
To implement this in your schematic, update $R1$ to have a resistance of 60 ohms.
Here's the revised connection summary:
  • $R1$:P1 connected to $PowerNet1$:P1
  • $R1$:P2 connected to $D1$:A
  • $D1$:K connected to GND
1y
10
I'm looking to build a highly efficient esc, for which im using 2ed2184 drivers ...

@copilot I'm looking to build a highly efficient esc, for which im using 2ed2184 drivers and stm32 to conmutate it using 20khz frequency, which are the best mosfets to use or igbts that will minimize them warming up when using a 48v and a 300w motor, I expect to pull around 10A
1y
For designing a highly efficient Electronic Speed Controller (ESC) using 2ED2184 drivers and an STM32 microcontroller to operate at 20kHz, with a 48V, 300W motor drawing around 10A, you should consider the following factors when selecting MOSFETs or IGBTs to minimize heating:
MOSFET Selection
Given your requirements, MOSFETs are generally more suitable than IGBTs due to their lower conduction losses at lower current levels, such as 10A, and higher efficiency at switching frequencies like 20kHz. For your ESC application, you should look for the following characteristics in MOSFETs:
  • Low R_DS(ON)\_{DS(ON)}: A low on-resistance will minimize conduction losses, which is crucial for high efficiency and reducing heat generation.
  • High VDSSV_{DSS}: The drain-source voltage rating should be safely above your operating voltage of 48V to handle voltage spikes without breakdown. A safety margin suggests choosing MOSFETs with at least a 60V rating, but more conservatively, a 100V rating would provide additional headroom.
  • Fast switching capability: Look for MOSFETs with low input and output capacitance to ensure they can switch efficiently at 20kHz without introducing significant switching losses.
  • Appropriate package for thermal management: Ensure the MOSFET package can handle the thermal dissipation requirements. Packages with exposed pads (such as D2PAK or PowerSO-8) can help improve heat dissipation.
Specific Recommendations:
  • Infineon Technologies’ OptiMOS™ series: MOSFETs such as BSC010N04LS are designed for applications requiring high efficiency and power density, offering low R_DS(ON)\_{DS(ON)} and robustness against voltage spikes.
  • Nexperia's Power MOSFETs: Models like PSMN1R0-30YL offer low on-state resistance and are designed for high efficiency in power conversion applications.
  • STMicroelectronics' STripFET F7 Power MOSFETs: Devices like STD140N6F7 offer excellent switching performance for high frequency applications, combined with low conduction losses.
Mosfets vs IGBTs for this Application:
While IGBTs can be used in high voltage, high power applications and have lower saturation voltage, which can be beneficial under certain conditions, their slower switching speed compared to MOSFETs makes them less ideal for high-frequency applications like yours. Therefore, for a 20kHz switching application drawing around 10A, MOSFETs are generally preferred due to their faster switching speeds and lower losses, especially critical at the lower power levels you're working with.
Important:
Always ensure to adequately design your ESC’s PCB layout to minimize trace inductances and to implement effective thermal management strategies, including using appropriate heatsinks or cooling methods as necessary. Heat generated by the MOSFETs during operation should be efficiently dissipated to prevent overheating and ensure reliable operation.
Adjustments to the final selection may be necessary based on your specific requirements and constraints, including form factor, budget, and availability.
1y
@copilot talking about through hole components, which mosfet(s) would you recommend?
1y
For a through-hole component preference in your Electronic Speed Controller (ESC) design, incorporating 2ED2184 drivers, an STM32 microcontroller for commutation at 20kHz, using a 48V supply for a 300W, 10A motor, the following through-hole MOSFETs are excellent choices due to their low on-resistance, high voltage ratings, and robust thermal performance:
Through-Hole MOSFET Recommendations
  1. IRFZ44N by Infineon Technologies (formerly International Rectifier)
    • Voltage Rating ($V_{DSS}$): 55V
    • Continuous Drain Current ($I_{D}$): 49A
    • R$_{DS(ON)}$: 17.5 mΩ at 10V gate drive
    • Package: TO-220
    • This MOSFET is widely used in high-speed switching applications due to its low gate charge and low R$_{DS(ON)}$, making it suitable for efficient switching and power handling in your ESC.
  2. STP55NF06L by STMicroelectronics
    • Voltage Rating ($V_{DSS}$): 60V
    • Continuous Drain Current ($I_{D}$): 55A
    • R$_{DS(ON)}$: 14 mΩ at 10V gate drive
    • Package: TO-220
    • This MOSFET features low threshold voltage and low on-resistance, making it particularly suited for low voltage, high efficiency designs. Given its performance characteristics, it can provide effective switching while minimizing heat generation in your ESC.
  3. AO3401 by Alpha & Omega Semiconductor (AOS)
    • Voltage Rating ($V_{DSS}$): 30V (Note: This is lower than the recommended 60V minimum. Use with caution and consider your duty cycle and peak voltages carefully.)
    • Continuous Drain Current ($I_{D}$): 4A
    • R$_{DS(ON)}$: 45 mΩ at 4.5V gate drive
    • Package: TO-92
    • Although its voltage rating is significantly below your operating voltage, its inclusion here is to highlight a commonly available through-hole option. This component should only be considered if your design can ensure operations well below its maximum rated voltage, which in most cases for a 48V application, it cannot. Selection was made prior to acknowledging the voltage mismatch.
Selection Criteria and Recommendations:
  • Considering IRFZ44N or STP55NF06L are more suitable for your application due to their higher voltage ratings, ensuring a comfortable safety margin above your 48V operating voltage.
  • The IRFZ44N and STP55NF06L both offer low on-resistance, which is crucial for reducing conduction losses and thus heat build-up in your application.
  • It's crucial to ensure that the chosen MOSFET can handle the thermal load. Proper heatsinking and possibly forced air cooling should be considered, especially if the ESC is confined without much airflow.
  • For efficient switching at 20kHz, ensure that the gate drive circuitry can provide fast rising and falling edges to minimize switching losses.
Please Note: The AO3401 is listed to show range but is not recommended for your specific 48V application due to its lower voltage rating. The inclusion was mistakenly based on the request for through-hole components without appropriately filtering for your project's voltage requirement. Stick with options like the IRFZ44N or STP55NF06L for safety and reliability.
1y
3
HCPL2731M FIND A COMPONENT WITH THE SAME FOOTPRINT, IF POSSIBLE THAT ITS MANUFAC...

@copilot HCPL2731M FIND A COMPONENT WITH THE SAME FOOTPRINT, IF POSSIBLE THAT ITS MANUFACTURER SEARCH NUMBER
1y
Finding a replacement for the HCPL-2731M optocoupler with the same footprint and preferably with a manufacturer part number (MPN) that can be searched easily can be a bit of a challenge without direct access to a database for cross-referencing. However, I'll guide you through the considerations you should take into account and suggest a potential approach to find a suitable replacement.
Considerations for Replacement
  1. Footprint/Package: The HCPL-2731M typically comes in an 8-DIP (Dual In-Line Package) or SOIC-8 (Small Outline Integrated Circuit) package. Ensure the replacement has the same package to match the PCB footprint.
  2. Pin Configuration: The replacement should ideally have the same pinout to avoid having to redesign the circuit around a different configuration.
  3. Electrical Specifications: Critical parameters such as input LED current, output transistor voltage and current, isolation voltage, transfer ratio, etc., should be similar or exceed the originals based on your application's requirements.
  4. Speed/Response Time: The speed of the optocoupler might be crucial depending on your application. Verify that any potential replacements have adequate response times.
Finding the Replacement
  • Manufacturer Part Number: When looking for a replacement, focus on the MPN for specificity. For an optocoupler similar to HCPL-2731M, you might consider components from the same manufacturer (Broadcom) or look into other reputable vendors like Toshiba, Vishay, or ON Semiconductor.
  • Online Distributors: Websites of electronic component distributors like DigiKey, Mouser, RS Components, or Arrow often have powerful search tools that allow you to filter components by specifications, including package type and electrical characteristics. This could be a good way to find a component with a matching or compatible footprint.
Suggested Approach
  1. Use Filters on Distributor Websites: Start by selecting the 8-DIP or SOIC-8 package filter, then proceed to specify other critical specifications as closely as possible to those of the HCPL-2731M.
  2. Check Datasheets: For any potential matches, review their datasheets meticulously to confirm the footprint compatibility, pin configuration, and that the electrical specifications meet your needs.
  3. Sample Ordering: If uncertain, consider ordering samples of the most promising candidates to verify their fit and functionality in your application firsthand.
Without direct access to a current database or knowing the exact application and specifications needed beyond the footprint, I'm unable to provide a specific part number. However, starting with Broadcom's own product line might yield a direct or closely related successor to the HCPL-2731M. Always cross-reference with the manufacturer's datasheets for the most accurate and up-to-date information.
1y
9
How much power must be dissipated by a IRFB7734 if I'm running 7A THROUGH it

@copilot How much power must be dissipated by a IRFB7734 if I'm running 7A THROUGH it
1y
To determine the power dissipated by the IRFB7734 when running 7A through it, we need to consider the on-state resistance ($R_{DS(on)}$) of the MOSFET when it's fully turned on, which directly influences the power dissipation due to the current flowing through it.
The IRFB7734 MOSFET has an $R_{DS(on)}$ typically around 1.4 mΩ when fully enhanced at a gate-source voltage of 10V. If you're operating the MOSFET in conditions where it's fully enhanced (assuming a gate-source voltage sufficient to fully turn it on), we can calculate the power dissipation using the formula:
P=I2×RP = I^2 \times R
where $P$ is the power dissipated, $I$ is the current through the device, and $R$ is the resistance ($R_{DS(on)}$).
Substituting the given values:
P=(7A)2×1.4mΩ=49A2×0.0014Ω=0.0686WP = (7\,A)^2 \times 1.4\,mΩ = 49\,A^2 \times 0.0014\,\Omega = 0.0686\,W
So, the power dissipation is roughly 68.6 mW under these conditions.
Keep in mind, this is a theoretical calculation under ideal conditions. In a real-world scenario, the actual power dissipation can be affected by various factors such as higher $R_{DS(on)}$ due to increased junction temperature, gate-source voltage lower than the ideal, etc. Additionally, considering thermal management and ensuring the MOSFET doesn't exceed its maximum junction temperature is crucial in practical applications.
1y
7
I want to add a low pass filter to make accurate readings from hall sensors in m...

@copilot for a voltage divider to estimate battery voltage of a 48v (consider at max charge is 54.6v), which resistor arrangement would be best to have the max voltage measured by the divider be 3.3v ?
1y
For designing a voltage divider that steps down a maximum voltage of 54.6V (which is the full charge voltage of your 48V nominal battery) to a maximum voltage of 3.3V, suitable for measurement by devices like microcontrollers operating at 3.3V, we can use the voltage divider formula:
The voltage divider equation is given by:
Vout=Vin×R2R1+R2V_{out} = V_{in} \times \frac{R2}{R1 + R2}
You want $V_{out}$ to be 3.3V at a $V_{in}$ of 54.6V. Rearranging the voltage divider equation to solve for the resistor ratio gives us:
R2R1+R2=VoutVin\frac{R2}{R1 + R2} = \frac{V_{out}}{V_{in}}
Substituting $V_{out} = 3.3V$ and $V_{in} = 54.6V$ into the equation:
R2R1+R2=3.354.60.06044\frac{R2}{R1 + R2} = \frac{3.3}{54.6} \approx 0.06044
This equation tells us the ratio between $R2$ and the total resistance ($R1 + R2$), but it doesn't give specific values for $R1$ and $R2$. There are many combinations of $R1$ and $R2$ that satisfy this ratio, but it's crucial to choose resistors that also allow for a current that is not too high (to avoid unnecessary power consumption) and not too low (to maintain accuracy and noise immunity).
A commonly used approach is to pick a total resistance in the range of tens of kilohms. If we choose a total resistance in the order of magnitude of 10k$\Omega$ to 100k$\Omega$, it balances power consumption and measurement accuracy well.
Let's use a total resistance around the middle of this range, say 60k$\Omega$, as an example to calculate a specific pair of resistors.
Given the ratio $R2 / (R1 + R2) \approx 0.06044$ and deciding $R1 + R2 = 60k\Omega$, you can solve a system of equations, or iterate with different values to match the conditions closely.
For simplicity, let’s pick $R2$ and calculate $R1$ based on our assumptions. If $R2$ is much smaller than $R1$, we can start with $R2$ being around 3.6k$\Omega$ which is approximately $0.06044 \times 60k\Omega$.
  • $R2 = 3.6k\Omega$ (a standard value close to the calculated ratio)
  • $R1 = 60k\Omega - R2 = 56.4k\Omega$
Since 56.4k$\Omega$ is not a standard resistor value, you would use the nearest standard value which is 56k$\Omega$.
So, your voltage divider will be:
  • R1 = 56k$\Omega$
  • R2 = 3.6k$\Omega$
To validate, check if the output voltage fits the desired 3.3V with these resistor values at a full charge of 54.6V battery voltage:
Vout=54.6V×3.6kΩ56kΩ+3.6kΩ3.31VV_{out} = 54.6V \times \frac{3.6k\Omega}{56k\Omega + 3.6k\Omega} \approx 3.31V
This is slightly above 3.3V, so you could fine-tune by selecting a slightly smaller $R2$ or larger $R1$ within the standard value range to perfectly match 3.3V. However, this small difference is usually acceptable given the tolerances of real-world components and the voltage range of ADCs (Analog to Digital Converters) in microcontrollers. Always check the maximum input voltage rating of your ADC to avoid damage.
1y
@copilot It is a tvs diode, SA48A
1y
To include a TVS (Transient Voltage Suppressor) diode like the SA48A in your project for protection against voltage spikes, here’s how you can proceed in Flux:
  1. Add the SA48A to your project:
    • You’ll need to create or find a component symbol for the SA48A. If it's not available in the Flux library, you can create a custom component symbol. The SA48A is a unidirectional TVS diode, so ensure the symbol accurately represents its anode and cathode.
  2. Electrical connections:
    • Since your project currently only lists a GND (Ground) pin, I’m assuming you want to protect a line from voltage spikes relative to GND. Typically, a TVS diode like the SA48A would be placed across the line to be protected and GND.
    Assuming the line you want to protect is connected to another pin in your project (let's call it VCC for this example, you'd need to add it), here’s how you would connect the SA48A:
    • Connect the SA48A's anode to the line you want to protect (e.g., VCC).
    • Connect the SA48A's cathode to GND.
    In terms of connections, it would look something like this:
    Connect SA48A:Anode to VCC.
    Connect SA48A:Cathode to GND:1.
    
  3. Component properties:
    • The SA48A has a standoff voltage of 48V, which means it's designed to suppress transient voltages above this threshold. Ensure your application voltage is below this to prevent the diode from conducting during normal operation.
    • Exclude the SA48A from the BOM: Since you mentioned excluding an item from the BOM earlier, make sure to adjust the BOM inclusion according to whether you want the SA48A included or not, based on your procurement needs.
  4. Testing and Simulation:
    • Before finalizing your design, consider simulating the circuit (if your design tool and workflow permit) to observe the behavior of the circuit with the TVS diode in place. This can help ensure the diode operates as expected under transient conditions.
Remember, these steps assume you want to protect a line (like a power supply line) against voltage spikes. If your application is different, please provide more details so I can offer more tailored advice.
1y
@copilot is the SA48A a viable option for this 500w esc im designing?
1y
To assess whether the SA48A is a viable option for your 500W Electronic Speed Controller (ESC) design, we need to consider several factors including the device's maximum voltage, current handling capabilities, efficiency, thermal performance, and whether it integrates well with the rest of your design.
The SA48A, without specific context, sounds like it could be a part number for a component, possibly a semiconductor such as a MOSFET, IGBT, or another power device. However, without exact details on the SA48A, I will make some general considerations for a 500W ESC:
  1. Voltage Rating: Your ESC will likely be operating at a voltage determined by the motors and battery pack used. The component should have a voltage rating higher than the highest voltage present in the system, ideally with some margin for safety and transient voltage spikes.
  2. Current Rating: For a 500W ESC, the component must be able to handle the maximum current your system will draw. You can estimate this by dividing the power (500W) by the system voltage. For example, if your ESC is for a 24V system, your current would be 500W24V20.8A\frac{500W}{24V} \approx 20.8A. The component should have a current rating above this calculated value, again with a safety margin.
  3. Efficiency and Thermal Performance: High efficiency is crucial in power electronics like an ESC to minimize heat generation. The chosen component should have low on-resistance ($R_{DS(on)}$ for MOSFETs) and be capable of dissipating heat effectively, possibly necessitating heat sinks.
  4. Switching Frequency: ESCs often operate at high frequencies (kHz range) for efficient and smooth motor control. Ensure that the SA48A can handle these frequencies without significant losses or heating.
  5. Package and Footprint: Ensure the physical size and package of the SA48A are compatible with your PCB layout and thermal management design.
  6. Protection Features: Overcurrent, overvoltage, and overtemperature protection are beneficial in ESC applications to improve reliability and safety.
Without the specific datasheet for the SA48A, I recommend closely reviewing its datasheet and ensuring it meets the criteria outlined above. If the SA48A is not a specific component you had in mind or if this doesn't match your component, please provide more information or clarify the component's characteristics so I can give a more targeted recommendation.
In any case, always validate your component choice with simulations and prototype testing under real-world conditions to ensure reliability and performance in your 500W ESC design.
1y
@copilot what's the difference between a unidirectional and bidirectional tvs diodes, if im designing an esc, which one would be better, and if im using a 48v battery, which voltage should I seek for?
1y
In the context of designing an electronic speed controller (ESC) for applications like electric vehicles, drones, or any motor control system, choosing the right type of Transient Voltage Suppression (TVS) diode is crucial for protecting your circuit against voltage spikes. Let's explore the key differences between unidirectional and bidirectional TVS diodes, and which type would be more suitable for an ESC, especially when using a 48V battery system.
Unidirectional TVS Diodes
  • Protection Direction: Unidirectional TVS diodes provide protection in one direction. They are designed to protect circuits from negative transients when the anode is connected to the higher potential side and the cathode to the lower potential side.
  • Use Case: They are typically used in DC circuits where the polarity is fixed, and protection is needed from voltage spikes in one direction only.
Bidirectional TVS Diodes
  • Protection Direction: Bidirectional TVS diodes can protect circuits from voltage spikes in both directions. They consist of two TVS diodes in series but oriented in opposite directions.
  • Use Case: These are suitable for AC circuits or DC circuits where there is a possibility of reverse polarity connections, or where both positive and negative transients could occur.
Choosing for an ESC Design
For an Electronic Speed Controller (ESC) that operates on a DC power supply, such as a 48V battery, the choice between unidirectional and bidirectional TVS diodes depends on the specific requirements and design of your circuit.
  • If your ESC is strictly going to be powered by a correctly oriented DC source (like a well-defined, non-reversible 48V battery system) and there's no chance of reverse polarity connection, a unidirectional TVS diode would typically suffice for protecting your circuit against positive voltage spikes.
  • However, if there's any possibility of reverse polarity connections or negative transients that need to be guarded against, choosing a bidirectional TVS diode might be more prudent for comprehensive protection.
Voltage Selection
When selecting a TVS diode for use with a 48V battery, consider the following:
  • Stand-off Voltage (VWMV_{WM}): Choose a TVS diode with a stand-off voltage higher than the operating voltage of your circuit but close to it. For a 48V system, you might consider TVS diodes with stand-off voltages slightly above 48V, such as 50V or 54V, assuming these are available and fit your design criteria.
  • Breakdown Voltage (VBRV_{BR}): This should be higher than the maximum expected operating voltage but as low as possible to ensure the diode will clamp voltage spikes effectively. A common rule is to select a VBRV_{BR} that is 10-20% higher than your maximum system voltage.
  • Peak Pulse Power (PPPMP_{PPM}): Ensure it can handle the maximum transient power (in Watts) expected in your application.
Given these guidelines, for a 48V battery-operated ESC, a unidirectional TVS diode might typically be best suited if the system is purely DC with no risk of reverse connection. Choose a diode with appropriate voltage ratings to ensure it protects your circuit without interfering with its normal operation.
1y
@copilot I want to add a low pass filter to make accurate readings from hall sensors in my bldc motor, I aleady have an external pull-up for the sensors, which value do you recommend me to use for this filter? It's vdd is 3.3v
1y
For creating a low-pass filter suitable for reading signals from Hall sensors in a BLDC motor environment and given that you have an external pull-up for the sensors operating at a 3.3V Vdd, a simple RC (resistor-capacitor) low-pass filter can be used to filter out the high-frequency noise, enabling more accurate readings.
Design Considerations:
  1. Cut-off Frequency: To select appropriate values for the resistor and capacitor, you first need to determine the desired cut-off frequency ($f_c$) of your low-pass filter. This frequency should be lower than the noise frequency you wish to eliminate but high enough not to filter out the signal frequency from the Hall sensors.
  2. Hall Sensor Output Frequency: Assume your BLDC motor's maximum RPM is known, and you have the number of pole pairs. The frequency of the signal ($f_{signal}$) can be calculated using $f_{signal} = \frac{RPM \times Poles}{60}$.
  3. Filter Choice: A commonly used rule is to choose a cut-off frequency ($f_c$) that is at least 10 times lower than your interfering noise frequency but close to your signal frequency to preserve signal integrity.
Calculation:
  • Assuming a desired cut-off frequency (as a starting point) of around 1 kHz, we use the formula $f_c = \frac{1}{2\pi RC}$ where:
    • $f_c$ is the cut-off frequency,
    • $R$ is the resistance,
    • $C$ is the capacitance.
Recommendations:
  • For simplicity and to work with standard component values, you might choose:
    • $R = 10,k\Omega$ (10 kilo-ohms)
    • $C = 15,nF$ (15 nano-farads)
This gives a cut-off frequency ($f_c$) of approximately $f_c = \frac{1}{2\pi \times 10^4 \times 15 \times 10^{-9}} \approx 1.06,kHz$.
Implementation:
  • Create the low-pass filter by connecting:
    • A resistor (R) of 10kΩ in series with the Hall sensor output.
    • A capacitor (C) of 15nF from the point between the resistor and the sensor output to GND.
Note:
This is a starting point. You should adjust the values based on the actual RPM of your BLDC motor and the frequency of the noise you wish to filter out. Testing and iteration may be necessary to achieve optimal performance without significantly affecting the sensor signal integrity.
Do you need guidance on how to implement this in your Flux project, or have any other questions?
1y
5
if I have a 3.3v supply, a 2.1v LED, what's the biggest resistor I could use to ...

@copilot if I have a 3.3v supply, a 2.1v LED, what's the biggest resistor I could use to draw 10mA?
1y
To determine the largest resistor you can use to achieve a current draw of 10mA with a 3.3V supply and a 2.1V LED, you would use Ohm's Law:
R=VsupVLEDIR = \frac{V_{\text{sup}} - V_{\text{LED}}}{I}
where:
  • $V_{\text{sup}}$ is the supply voltage (3.3V)
  • $V_{\text{LED}}$ is the forward voltage of the LED (2.1V)
  • $I$ is the desired current (10mA or 0.01A)
Let's plug in the values:
R=3.3V2.1V0.01A=1.2V0.01A=120ΩR = \frac{3.3V - 2.1V}{0.01A} = \frac{1.2V}{0.01A} = 120 \, \Omega
So, the largest resistor you could use is:
R=120ΩR = 120 \, \Omega
1y
12
I'm designing an ESC for a 500W, 48v motor, using 2ED2184 gate drivers and IRB77...

@copilot I'm designing an ESC for a 500W, 48v motor, using 2ED2184 gate drivers and IRB7734 Mosfets, I want to protect my micocontroller (STM32) by using optocouplers, which one would you recommend for me to use?
1y
For your ESC (Electronic Speed Controller) project designed to control a 500W, 48V motor, using 2ED2184 gate drivers and IRB7734 MOSFETs, incorporating optocouplers is an excellent strategy to protect your microcontroller, in this case, an STM32, from high-voltage spikes and noise. Given these components, you’re likely dealing with relatively high-frequency PWM (Pulse Width Modulation) signals to control the speed and direction of the motor.
A suitable optocoupler for interfacing between your STM32 microcontroller and the gate drivers should ideally meet the following criteria:
  • High Speed: To handle fast PWM signals efficiently.
  • Good Isolation Voltage: To ensure adequate protection for the MCU.
  • Low Input Current Requirement: To be easily driven by the MCU GPIOs.
Considering these, I recommend the 6N137 High-Speed Optocoupler. Here are its key features that make it suitable for your application:
  • Speed: Offers high data rates (up to 10 Mbit/s), making it excellent for high-speed signal isolation.
  • Isolation Voltage: Provides a typical isolation voltage of 3750Vrms, which offers a good safety margin for protecting your microcontroller.
  • Low Input Current Required: This can be driven directly by the STM32’s GPIO pins without needing intermediate amplification.
To implement the 6N137 in your schematic, consider the following connections:
  • From STM32 to Optocoupler (for signal transmission)
    • Connect STM32 GPIO (e.g., STM32:TX) to 6N137:1 (Anode of the input LED).
    • Connect 6N137:2 (Cathode of the input LED) to STM32:GND.
  • From Optocoupler to Gate Driver (to drive the MOSFETs)
    • Connect 6N137:5 (Collector of the output transistor) to the Gate Driver signal input (e.g., 2ED2184:IN).
    • Connect 6N137:6 (Emitter of the output transistor) to the Ground reference of the Gate Driver circuit, which might be shared with the STM32:GND depending on your isolation strategy.
Additional Recommendations:
  • Resistor on Input Side: Place a current-limiting resistor between the STM32 GPIO and the 6N137:1. The value depends on your microcontroller's voltage level and the LED forward voltage and current. Assuming a 3.3V GPIO and aiming for about 10mA through the LED, a resistor value around $270\Omega$ could be a starting point. Calculate the exact value using $R = \frac{V_{GPIO} - V_{F}}{I_F}$, where $V_{F}$ is the forward voltage of the LED in the 6N137, and $I_F$ is the desired forward current.
  • Pull-Up Resistor on Output Side: Consider adding a pull-up resistor to the output side (connected to 6N137:5) to ensure proper logic level behavior upon the optocoupler's transistor turning off. The resistor value typically depends on the input impedance of the gate driver and the desired logic levels.
Remember, the suggestion above is based on a general understanding of your project requirements. It’s essential to review the datasheets of the components you’re using, including the 6N137 and 2ED2184 gate drivers, to ensure compatibility and to adjust the resistor values as necessary for optimal performance.
1y
2
a 36v motor of 350w needs is supplied by a 48v battery, however under a load it ...

@copilot a 36v motor of 350w needs is supplied by a 48v battery, however under a load it doesn't seem to generate enough torque when I'm using my own designed esc, I'm using a 70% duty cycle of a 20khz commutation, the motor seems to want to spin but it gets stuck and can't generate enough movement, is increasing the duty cycle to 90% good?
1y
Increasing the duty cycle from 70% to 90% to improve the torque of a motor when using an electronic speed controller (ESC) could potentially help, as a higher duty cycle will result in a higher average voltage being supplied to the motor, which in turn can increase the torque. However, there are important considerations to keep in mind:
  1. Motor and ESC Ratings: Ensure that both the motor and the ESC can handle the increase in duty cycle without overheating or overcurrent, which could potentially damage the components. Given that you're using a 36V motor with a 48V battery, the system likely has some design margin, but increasing the duty cycle will also increase the stress on the system.
  2. Battery Voltage: Operating a 36V motor with a 48V battery (evenat70(even at 70% duty cycle) already subjects the motor to higher than nominal voltage. Increasing the duty cycle further pushes this boundary. Ensure the motor's insulation and winding can handle the increased electrical stress.
  3. Efficiency and Heat: Higher duty cycles will increase power throughput, potentially leading to increased heat generation. Ensure your system has adequate cooling to dissipate extra heat generated by both the motor and ESC.
  4. Acceleration and Load: If the motor is having trouble starting under load, it might not only be a question of duty cycle. Consider the possibility of adding a soft start mechanism or adjusting the acceleration profile to reduce the initial load.
  5. Motor Control Algorithm Adjustments: Beyond adjusting the duty cycle, look into optimizing your commutation approach. If feasible, consider field-oriented control (FOC) for better performance under various load conditions.
Before making any changes:
  • Simulate the expected changes if possible to predict outcomes without risking hardware.
  • Gradually Increase the duty cycle while monitoring motor and ESC temperature and performance. Abrupt changes can lead to unexpected outcomes.
  • Monitor Current Draw to ensure it doesn't exceed the ratings of your motor, ESC, and battery.
In summary, increasing the duty cycle to 90% could help with the torque issue, but it's essential to consider the limitations and ensure that all components can safely handle the increased power. Adjusting your ESC's control strategy and introducing gradual changes with careful monitoring could provide a safer and more efficient solution.
1y
@copilot is using a 90% duty cycle at the start a common thing? or at the start which duty cycle is normal under a load?
1y
Using a 90% duty cycle right at the start, especially under load, is not typically common in many motor control applications due to several practical considerations. The initial duty cycle and ramp-up strategy depend significantly on the application, the type of motor, and the load characteristics. Here's a general overview:
  1. Soft Start Technique: When starting under load, a soft start technique is often employed. This involves starting the motor at a lower duty cycle (or lower voltage) and gradually increasing it to limit the inrush current. This helps in reducing mechanical stress on the motor and the driven system, as well as electrical stress on the power electronics.
  2. Initial Duty Cycle: The normal initial duty cycle can vary widely but usually starts much lower than 90% to manage torque production and current draw smoothly. For many applications, it might begin in the range of 10% to 30% and then increase based on a predetermined acceleration profile or in response to feedback from the motor (e.g., current, speed).
  3. Load Considerations: The ideal starting duty cycle is also heavily influenced by the type of load the motor is driving. For example:
    • Constant Loads: might allow for a moderate starting duty cycle because the required torque does not dramatically change.
    • Variable or High-Start Loads: such as compressors or heavy machinery, may require careful consideration of the starting duty cycle to prevent overload conditions or excessive torque that could damage the system.
  4. Feedback and Control Algorithms: Modern motor control systems frequently use feedback mechanisms (like encoders or Hall sensors) and sophisticated algorithms (like Field-Oriented Control or FOC) that dynamically adjust the duty cycle based on real-time performance metrics. This allows the system to start under a variety of conditions with optimal efficiency and control.
  5. Exception Cases: There might be specific cases where a high initial duty cycle is necessary and feasible—particularly where immediate high torque is needed, and the system is designed to handle the associated stresses. However, these are exceptions rather than the rule and require careful engineering to ensure system longevity and safety.
In conclusion, starting a motor under load with a high duty cycle like 90% is generally avoided in favor of a controlled ramp-up strategy to protect the motor, load, and electronic control system from excessive stress. The specific starting duty cycle and ramp parameters should be determined based on the motor characteristics, application requirements, and thorough testing to ensure reliable and safe operation.
1y
4
VOH263A is this a good optocoupler to protect my circuit for a bldc esc 500w or ...

@copilot VOH263A is this a good optocoupler to protect my circuit for a bldc esc 500w or is there any better optocoupler?
1y
The VOH263A you mentioned seems to be a typo or an incorrect part number, as it doesn't match the common naming conventions for optocouplers or optoisolators used in electronic circuits. It's very likely you meant to refer to a part in the Vishay VO series, or it might be a mix-up with another part number.
Optocouplers are crucial for electrically isolating different parts of a circuit, like the sensitive control electronics from the high-power output stage in a Brushless DC (BLDC) Electronic Speed Controller (ESC) for a 500W motor. This isolation protects the control side from high voltage or current spikes that could occur on the power side.
If you are looking for an optocoupler suitable for a 500W BLDC ESC application, consider these critical parameters:
  • Current Transfer Ratio (CTR): High enough to ensure the control signal is accurately passed from the input LED to the output transistor.
  • Isolation Voltage: Sufficiently high to protect against voltage spikes. Typically, a value of several kV is desirable for motor control applications.
  • Speed: Fast enough to switch in accordance with the signal requirements of a BLDC motor which can have high PWM frequencies.
  • Package Type: Depending on your size constraints or layout requirements.
  • Power Dissipation: Should be adequate for the expected operating conditions.
Given these requirements, a few recommendations would be:
  • PC817: A widely used, general-purpose optocoupler with moderate speed and a decent CTR, suitable for less demanding applications.
  • TLP250/TLP281: Offers higher speed and isolation voltage. It's suited for driving gates of MOSFETs or IGBTs, which is typical in ESCs for BLDC motors.
  • ACPL-332J: This is a high-speed, high-isolation optocoupler with an integrated gate drive, providing advanced features suitable for high-power applications.
For a 500W ESC, assuming you need to drive power MOSFETs or IGBTs and require both good isolation and fast response, the TLP250 or TLP281 could be a good choice. The ACPL-332J could offer even better performance with its integrated advanced features but at a higher cost.
Consider your specific needs, including switching frequency, isolation requirements, and total budget. Also, pay attention to the availability of components, as the market can significantly fluctuate.
Please check the part numbers and specifications I mentioned using the latest datasheets or manufacturer information, as specific project requirements and newer parts available on the market might offer better performance or value.
1y
6
R1
Resistance
500 Ω
D1


  • Ground
    A common return path for electric current. Commonly known as ground.
  • Net Portal
    Wirelessly connects nets on schematic. Used to organize schematics and separate functional blocks. To wirelessly connect net portals, give them same designator. #portal
  • Power Net Portal
    Wirelessly connects power nets on schematic. Identical to the net portal, but with a power symbol. Used to organize schematics and separate functional blocks. To wirelessly connect power net portals, give them the same designator. #portal #power
  • Generic Resistor
    A generic fixed resistor for rapid developing circuit topology. Save precious design time by seamlessly add more information to this part (value, footprint, etc.) as it becomes available. Standard resistor values: 1.0Ω 10Ω 100Ω 1.0kΩ 10kΩ 100kΩ 1.0MΩ 1.1Ω 11Ω 110Ω 1.1kΩ 11kΩ 110kΩ 1.1MΩ 1.2Ω 12Ω 120Ω 1.2kΩ 12kΩ 120kΩ 1.2MΩ 1.3Ω 13Ω 130Ω 1.3kΩ 13kΩ 130kΩ 1.3MΩ 1.5Ω 15Ω 150Ω 1.5kΩ 15kΩ 150kΩ 1.5MΩ 1.6Ω 16Ω 160Ω 1.6kΩ 16kΩ 160kΩ 1.6MΩ 1.8Ω 18Ω 180Ω 1.8KΩ 18kΩ 180kΩ 1.8MΩ 2.0Ω 20Ω 200Ω 2.0kΩ 20kΩ 200kΩ 2.0MΩ 2.2Ω 22Ω 220Ω 2.2kΩ 22kΩ 220kΩ 2.2MΩ 2.4Ω 24Ω 240Ω 2.4kΩ 24kΩ 240kΩ 2.4MΩ 2.7Ω 27Ω 270Ω 2.7kΩ 27kΩ 270kΩ 2.7MΩ 3.0Ω 30Ω 300Ω 3.0KΩ 30KΩ 300KΩ 3.0MΩ 3.3Ω 33Ω 330Ω 3.3kΩ 33kΩ 330kΩ 3.3MΩ 3.6Ω 36Ω 360Ω 3.6kΩ 36kΩ 360kΩ 3.6MΩ 3.9Ω 39Ω 390Ω 3.9kΩ 39kΩ 390kΩ 3.9MΩ 4.3Ω 43Ω 430Ω 4.3kΩ 43KΩ 430KΩ 4.3MΩ 4.7Ω 47Ω 470Ω 4.7kΩ 47kΩ 470kΩ 4.7MΩ 5.1Ω 51Ω 510Ω 5.1kΩ 51kΩ 510kΩ 5.1MΩ 5.6Ω 56Ω 560Ω 5.6kΩ 56kΩ 560kΩ 5.6MΩ 6.2Ω 62Ω 620Ω 6.2kΩ 62KΩ 620KΩ 6.2MΩ 6.8Ω 68Ω 680Ω 6.8kΩ 68kΩ 680kΩ 6.8MΩ 7.5Ω 75Ω 750Ω 7.5kΩ 75kΩ 750kΩ 7.5MΩ 8.2Ω 82Ω 820Ω 8.2kΩ 82kΩ 820kΩ 8.2MΩ 9.1Ω 91Ω 910Ω 9.1kΩ 91kΩ 910kΩ 9.1MΩ #generics #CommonPartsLibrary
  • Generic Capacitor
    A generic fixed capacitor ideal for rapid circuit topology development. You can choose between polarized and non-polarized types, its symbol and the footprint will automatically adapt based on your selection. Supported options include standard SMD sizes for ceramic capacitors (e.g., 0402, 0603, 0805), SMD sizes for aluminum electrolytic capacitors, and through-hole footprints for polarized capacitors. Save precious design time by seamlessly add more information to this part (value, footprint, etc.) as it becomes available. Standard capacitor values: 1.0pF 10pF 100pF 1000pF 0.01uF 0.1uF 1.0uF 10uF 100uF 1000uF 10,000uF 1.1pF 11pF 110pF 1100pF 1.2pF 12pF 120pF 1200pF 1.3pF 13pF 130pF 1300pF 1.5pF 15pF 150pF 1500pF 0.015uF 0.15uF 1.5uF 15uF 150uF 1500uF 1.6pF 16pF 160pF 1600pF 1.8pF 18pF 180pF 1800pF 2.0pF 20pF 200pF 2000pF 2.2pF 22pF 20pF 2200pF 0.022uF 0.22uF 2.2uF 22uF 220uF 2200uF 2.4pF 24pF 240pF 2400pF 2.7pF 27pF 270pF 2700pF 3.0pF 30pF 300pF 3000pF 3.3pF 33pF 330pF 3300pF 0.033uF 0.33uF 3.3uF 33uF 330uF 3300uF 3.6pF 36pF 360pF 3600pF 3.9pF 39pF 390pF 3900pF 4.3pF 43pF 430pF 4300pF 4.7pF 47pF 470pF 4700pF 0.047uF 0.47uF 4.7uF 47uF 470uF 4700uF 5.1pF 51pF 510pF 5100pF 5.6pF 56pF 560pF 5600pF 6.2pF 62pF 620pF 6200pF 6.8pF 68pF 680pF 6800pF 0.068uF 0.68uF 6.8uF 68uF 680uF 6800uF 7.5pF 75pF 750pF 7500pF 8.2pF 82pF 820pF 8200pF 9.1pF 91pF 910pF 9100pF #generics #CommonPartsLibrary
  • Generic Inductor
    A generic fixed inductor for rapid developing circuit topology. *You can now change the footprint and 3D model at the top level anytime you want. This is the power of #generics
  • Terminal
    Terminal
    An electrical connector acting as reusable interface to a conductor and creating a point where external circuits can be connected.
  • RMCF0805JT47K0
    47 kOhms ±5% 0.125W, 1/8W Chip Resistor 0805 (2012 Metric) Automotive AEC-Q200 Thick Film #forLedBlink
  • 875105359001
    10uF Capacitor Aluminum Polymer 20% 16V SMD 5x5.3mm #forLedBlink #commonpartslibrary #capacitor #aluminumpolymer #radialcan
  • CTL1206FYW1T
    Yellow 595nm LED Indication - Discrete 1.7V 1206 (3216 Metric) #forLedBlink
ESC_SEM_2024 thumbnail
Welcome to your new project. Imagine what you can build here.

Properties

Properties describe core aspects of the project.

Pricing & Availability

Distributor

Qty 1

Assets

No assets added.

Controls