Part Information Review and Update
https://suddendocs.samtec.com/productspecs/tsw-sxx.pdf after confirming the project review flagged Datasheet as missing and web search identified that Samtec-hosted PDF as the correct official source for this series.Table
| Field | Current value |
|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Samtec |
| MPN | TSW-105-07-G-S |
| Designator Prefix | J |
| Description | Connector Header Through Hole 5 position 0.100" (2.54 mm), SWD header 1x5 2.54 mm |
| Datasheet | Now set to official Samtec series PDF |
Pin Number set to 01-05Pin Type set to PassiveSAMTEC_TSW-105-07-G-S.kicad_modTSW-105-07-G-S.step105 = 5 positions07 = lead style -07G = gold platingS = single rowTable
| Item | Project | Datasheet | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MPN | TSW-105-07-G-S | TSW-105-07-G-S family decode matches exact variant | Match |
| Manufacturer | Samtec | Samtec | Match |
| Pin count | 5 terminals / 5 pads | 105 = 5 positions | Match |
| Row count | Single row | S = single row | Match |
| Pitch | Implied by SWD header description / indexed footprint | 2.54 mm | Match |
| Mount style | Description says through-hole | TSW is vertical through-hole for this variant | Match |
| Symbol ordering | 01 to 05 in a single vertical column | Single-row numbering is consistent with a 1x5 header | Match |
| Footprint pad count | 5 pads | 5-position part | Match |
Table
| Area | Finding | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Datasheet property | Was missing; now fixed | Resolved |
| Pin descriptions | No pin names or descriptions are present on 01, 02, 03, 04, 05 | Warning |
| Symbol metadata | No pin group, section, or orientation metadata beyond pin number/type/position | Warning |
| Footprint geometry verification | Indexed project data confirms 5 pads and 2.54 mm pitch, but does not expose full raw pad geometry, so I could not directly verify copper pad size/shape or drill definition from the stored footprint file itself | Partial verification only |
| Package property | I did not find a dedicated package/property field populated for the part | Warning |
| Review inconsistency | The review engine still reports project Part Type missing, even though project context shows Part Type: Connector | Needs recheck |
Part Type