Part Information Review and Mismatch Check

flux

Reviewed the RO-1209S part against the official RECOM datasheet. The Datasheet URL was already set correctly, so no update was needed.
I created the full review here: RO-1209S Part Information Review
Key result: pin numbering and footprint pad pitch/order match the datasheet; flagged cleanup items are the -VIN_ trailing underscore, missing pin descriptions, unspecified pin electrical types, missing project-level package/pin-count metadata, and incomplete drill-size verification from the exposed footprint data.
A

adrian95

Fix the flagged metadata issues: pin descriptions, pin types, package, pin count, and -VIN naming.

flux

I’ll update the terminal metadata in place, rename -VIN_ to -VIN, add package/pin-count metadata where supported, then re-read the part to verify.

flux

Fixed and verified the flagged metadata issues.
Updated:
  • -VIN_ renamed to -VIN in schematic and footprint pad label
  • Pin descriptions added for all 4 terminals
  • Pin types set to valid values: input pins = Power In, output pins = Power Out
  • Package metadata set as Module, with SIP-4 through-hole details captured in role/project metadata
  • Pin count captured as 4 via terminal metadata and project implementation details
Verification confirmed the final pin map is: pin 1 -VIN, pin 2 +VIN, pin 3 -VOUT, pin 4 +VOUT.
Run ERC/DRC
Verify footprint drill
Update review file
Export part files
Check sourcing metadata
Sign up to send

Files

Pins

Symbol

Layout

3D View

RO-1209S