Part Information Review and Validation
Thought for 2 mins 30 sec
I reviewed the current part project against the datasheet using the datasheet as the source of truth and checked that the symbol/footprint pin count matches exactly, which is the right verification flow for part projects
Result
- Datasheet URL already exists in project properties, so no web lookup or property update was needed.
- Pin count matches: datasheet says 9-pin LGA; the project has 9 symbol terminals and 9 footprint pads.
- Main issues found:
- All terminal Pin Type properties are currently Unspecified
- Several terminal names use normalized variants instead of exact datasheet naming:
INTNvs datasheet INTnCSNvs datasheet CSnVSS_1/VSS_2vs datasheet VSS for pins 8 and 9
- No obvious symbol-to-footprint pin mapping mismatch was found.
Table
| Field | Current value | Check |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer Part Number | ENS160-BGLT | OK |
| Manufacturer Name | ScioSense | Acceptable, datasheet gives ScioSense B.V. |
| Designator Prefix | IC | Acceptable for an IC/sensor |
| Datasheet URL | Set | OK |
| Description | Air Quality Sensors ENS160-BGLT LGA9 T&R 1K5 | Usable, but not ideal as a functional description |
| Package / Case | Not present as property | Missing |
| Part Type | Not present as property | Missing |
| Operating Voltage | Not present as property | Missing |
| Operating Temperature | Not present as property | Missing |
Table
| Item | Datasheet value |
|---|---|
| Part | ENS160-BGLT |
| Manufacturer | ScioSense B.V. |
| Type | Digital multi-gas sensor |
| Sensing technology | MOX, 4 sensor elements |
| Outputs | eCO2, TVOC, AQI, plus raw data |
| Package | 9-pin LGA |
| Package size | 3.0 mm × 3.0 mm × 0.9 mm max |
| Interfaces | I2C and 4-wire SPI slave |
| VDD | 1.71 V to 1.98 V |
| VDDIO | 1.71 V to 3.6 V |
| Temperature range | -40°C to +85°C |
| I2C address select | 0x52 / 0x53 via ADDR |
| SPI/I2C select | CSn low = SPI, high = I2C |
Table
| Pin # | Project terminal | Datasheet name | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MOSI_/_SDA | MOSI / SDA | OK | Name formatting differs only stylistically |
| 2 | SCLK_/_SCL | SCLK / SCL | OK | Name formatting differs only stylistically |
| 3 | MISO_/_ADDR | MISO / ADDR | OK | Name formatting differs only stylistically |
| 4 | VDD | VDD | OK | |
| 5 | VDDIO | VDDIO | OK | |
| 6 | INTN | INTn | Minor mismatch | Case/style mismatch |
| 7 | CSN | CSn | Minor mismatch | Case/style mismatch |
| 8 | VSS_1 | VSS | Minor mismatch | Split naming for duplicate ground pin |
| 9 | VSS_2 | VSS | Minor mismatch | Split naming for duplicate ground pin |
All 9 terminals currently have Pin Type = Unspecified. For an IC-style part, pin properties should be explicitly assigned from the datasheet rather than left unspecified
Recommended pin types:
Table
| Project terminal | Recommended Pin Type | Short description |
|---|---|---|
| MOSI_/_SDA | Bi-Directional | SPI MOSI / I2C SDA |
| SCLK_/_SCL | Input | Serial clock input |
| MISO_/_ADDR | Bi-Directional | SPI MISO / I2C addr |
| VDD | Power In | Core supply |
| VDDIO | Power In | Interface supply |
| INTN | Output | Interrupt output |
| CSN | Input | Interface select |
| VSS_1 | Ground | Ground |
| VSS_2 | Ground | Ground |
- The project contains a default footprint asset: ENS160BGLT.kicad_mod
- The project also includes a 3D model
- The footprint has 9 pads
- Pad labels match the symbol pin mapping
- 9-pin LGA
- 3.0 mm × 3.0 mm
- 1.05 mm pitch
- Recommended land pattern: add 0.05 mm around nominal lead width/length
I could confirm pad count and pad naming, but the indexed layout data did not expose explicit pad geometry values like exact pad size, courtyard, or body outline dimensions. So I can say the footprint structure appears consistent, but I could not fully dimension-verify the land pattern numerically from the project data alone.
Key mismatches / gaps to flag
Table
| Area | Finding | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Pin types | All pins are Unspecified | Medium |
| Pin naming | INTN vs INTn | Low |
| Pin naming | CSN vs CSn | Low |
| Pin naming | VSS_1, VSS_2 vs datasheet VSS | Low |
| Metadata | Missing Part Type property | Medium |
| Metadata | Missing Package / Case property | Medium |
| Metadata | Missing electrical summary properties | Low |
| Footprint geometry | No explicit pad dimensions available in indexed project data | Low |
Based on the datasheet and the project-property sync rules
Table
| Property | Recommended value |
|---|---|
| Manufacturer Name | ScioSense B.V. |
| Part Type | Sensor |
| Package or Case Code | LGA-9, 3 mm × 3 mm × 0.9 mm |
| Operating Voltage | 3.6 for project max field only if you want interface max captured, or 1.98 if you want core VDD max captured; this one needs a convention decision |
| Operating Temperature | -40°C to +85°C |
- MPN, datasheet presence, symbol pin count, and footprint pad count are all good.
- The biggest correctness gap is that the terminals are not fully typed/configured.
- The only naming mismatches are minor capitalization/duplicate-ground naming differences.
- The footprint appears structurally correct, but I could not numerically confirm pad geometry from the available project layout data.
If you want, I can next fix the terminal properties and metadata so this part project is fully datasheet-aligned.
Fix pin properties
Add missing metadata
Check footprint dimensions
