Footprint and Datasheet Validation
4:18
Thought for 7s
Read schematic.
Read layout.
Read BOM.
Thought for 2s
Search TE Connectivity 6437288-4 official product page dimensions drawing.
Read product-6437288-4.html.
Read layout.
Part information review
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| MPN | 6437288-4 |
| Manufacturer | TE Connectivity |
| Part type | Connector / header |
| Description | 1.0 mm Header, Superseal 1.0, 26 way, 2 key (4 row), black, 90° molded gold pins, PCB mount, lower locking |
| Signal positions | 26 |
| Mounting features | 2 mounting holes |
| Mount style | PCB mount, right-angle / 90° |
| Contact plating | Gold |
| Rows | 4 |
| Project dimensions/property data | Connector length 36.5 mm, connector width 39.5 mm, profile height from PCB 27.9 mm |
| Schematic implementation | 26 numbered terminals plus MH1 and MH2 |
| Footprint asset | 64372884.kicad_mod |
| Datasheet URL present | Yes |
Datasheet metadata extracted
| Category | Extracted data |
|---|---|
| Family / series | Superseal 1.0 |
| Part description | 1.0 mm Header, Superseal 1.0, 26 way, 2 key (4 row), black, 90° molded gold pins, PCB mount, lower locking |
| Special features | Lower locking |
| Mounting orientation | 90° |
| Contact finish | Gold pins |
| Operating temperature | -40°C to +125°C |
| Rated current | Up to 14 A |
| Rated voltage | 24 V DC |
| Datasheet note | Users should evaluate suitability for the specific application |
Performance / environmental data found
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Operating temperature | -40°C to +125°C |
| Durability | 10 cycles at maximum rate of 600 cycles/hour |
| Physical shock | 50 G half-sine, 11 ms, no discontinuities of 1 microsecond or longer |
| Insulation resistance | 100 MΩ minimum |
| Immersion leakage | ≤ 50 µA at 48 V DC, 100 mm depth in 5% salt water for 1 hour at 23 ± 5°C |
| Random vibration | 10 G, 10 Hz to 500 Hz, 8 hours each plane |
| Withstand / listed voltage | 250 V AC |
Items not found in the scanned datasheet PDF
| Requested item | Result |
|---|---|
| Absolute maximum ratings table | Not explicitly provided as a dedicated table |
| Recommended operating conditions table | Not explicitly provided as a dedicated table |
| Individual pin / cavity descriptions | Not found |
| Pin assignment map | Not found |
| Recommended PCB land pattern | Not found |
| Mounting hole drawing | Not found in the scanned PDF |
| Detailed package mechanical drawing | Not found in the scanned PDF |
Cross-check of symbol and footprint vs available official data
| Check | Result | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Pin count | Footprint and symbol both implement 26 signal terminals plus 2 mounting holes | Low |
| Part style | Footprint is through-hole, right-angle, consistent with the product description | Low |
| Body envelope | Footprint outline is about 39.5 mm x 36.5 mm, matching the official dimensions seen on the TE product page | Low |
| Mounting holes | Two mechanical holes are present as MH1 and MH2 | Low |
| Pin numbering presence | Numbered positions exist in the symbol and footprint | Low |
| Pin electrical types | All schematic terminals are Unspecified | Medium |
| Pin names / functions | Symbol uses only numeric terminals; no cavity labels beyond numbers | Medium |
| Datasheet-to-footprint dimensional verification | Incomplete, because the scanned datasheet does not include the product drawing / recommended PCB layout | High |
| Drill / pad validation | Current footprint uses 1.5 mm drill and 2.25 mm pad for signal pins, but I could not verify these against an official TE drawing from the scanned PDF | High |
| Mechanical hole validation | Current footprint uses 3.4 mm drill, but I could not verify against the official product drawing from the scanned PDF | High |
Manufacturing / ordering / failure risks flagged
| Issue | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Missing verified product drawing dimensions | Without the official product drawing, signal-hole diameters, mounting-hole diameters, and row spacing cannot be fully confirmed. This is the biggest manufacturing risk. |
| No explicit package/footprint validation source in the scanned PDF | The current footprint may still be correct, but it is not fully traceable to the official drawing from the scanned PDF. |
| Unspecified schematic pin types | This can reduce ERC usefulness and make downstream integration less reliable. |
| No cavity function metadata | For a connector part, lack of named cavity metadata increases risk of wiring mistakes in end-use designs. |
Welcome 👋
Flux accelerates your PCB design with AI.
Create your account to start using this component and bring your ideas to life.