Part Audit Review

Thought for 6 sec

I’ll audit the part metadata, source the official AMD package/pinout documentation if needed, update the Datasheet property, then cross-check all 256 symbol pins and footprint pads and report any mismatches.

Worked for 3 mins 37 sec

Created a project doc

Part Audit Report

View Document

Part Audit Report Scope and disposition

Audited the published part project XC7A50T-1FTG256C (Part UID 705ae7d9-b982-4d06-8722-6dff2d32acfd) without changing its symbol or footprint. The existing project property named exactly Datasheet URL was already populated, so no property mutation was required.

Authoritative sources

AMD/Xilinx device/package pinout file (device-specific, 256 entries):
- https://download.amd.com/adaptive-socs-and-fpgas/developer/adaptive-socs-and-fpgas/package-pinout-files/a7packages/xc7a50tftg256pkg.txt
- Header: Device/Package xc7a50tftg256, dated 2013-10-04; states 256 pins.
AMD DS180, 7 Series FPGAs Data Sheet: Overview (the current Datasheet URL property):
- https://docs.amd.com/v/u/en-US/ds180_7Series_Overview

flux

Audit complete. All 256 symbol terminals map correctly to the 256 FTG256 footprint pads and official AMD pinout; package dimensions and core device specifications match.

Existing official AMD Datasheet URL was already set, so no update was needed.
Flagged issues: all terminal descriptions are missing; several JTAG, configuration, and analog pins use overly broad Bi-Directional types; package metadata says generic 256-BGA rather than FTG256.
Possible 3D-model height discrepancy requires direct STEP measurement to confirm.

Full findings and affected pins: Part Audit Report.

Fix terminal metadata

Refine package metadata

Add package reference

Review power pins

Files

Pins

Symbol

Layout

Preview

XC7A50T-1FTG256C