Part Audit Review
Review all available part information (MPN, package, pin count, description, properties). If no datasheet URL is already set, search the web for the official datasheet and update the part's Datasheet property with the URL. Then cross-check the schematic symbol, footprint, and pin descriptions against the datasheet. Summarize key specs and flag any mismatches.
Thought for 6 sec
I’ll audit the part metadata, source the official AMD package/pinout documentation if needed, update the Datasheet property, then cross-check all 256 symbol pins and footprint pads and report any mismatches.
Worked for 3 mins 37 sec
Created a project doc
Part Audit Report
Part Audit Report
Scope and disposition
Audited the published part project XC7A50T-1FTG256C (Part UID
Authoritative sources
705ae7d9-b982-4d06-8722-6dff2d32acfd) without changing its symbol or footprint. The existing project property named exactly Datasheet URL was already populated, so no property mutation was required.- AMD/Xilinx device/package pinout file (device-specific, 256 entries):
- https://download.amd.com/adaptive-socs-and-fpgas/developer/adaptive-socs-and-fpgas/package-pinout-files/a7packages/xc7a50tftg256pkg.txt
- Header:
Device/Package xc7a50tftg256, dated 2013-10-04; states 256 pins.
- AMD DS180, 7 Series FPGAs Data Sheet: Overview (the current
Datasheet URLproperty):
Audit complete. All 256 symbol terminals map correctly to the 256 FTG256 footprint pads and official AMD pinout; package dimensions and core device specifications match.
- Existing official AMD Datasheet URL was already set, so no update was needed.
- Flagged issues: all terminal descriptions are missing; several JTAG, configuration, and analog pins use overly broad
Bi-Directionaltypes; package metadata says generic256-BGArather thanFTG256. - Possible 3D-model height discrepancy requires direct STEP measurement to confirm.
Full findings and affected pins: Part Audit Report.
Fix terminal metadata
Refine package metadata
Add package reference
Review power pins
