I’ll audit the part metadata, locate the official TI documentation if needed, then verify symbol pins, footprint geometry, and descriptions against it. I’ll update the Datasheet property if absent and record a concise audit report with any mismatches.

I’m reading the current symbol and footprint now, including all 23 terminals and baked pad geometry, before comparing them with TI’s package documentation.

The part is modeled as 23 terminal objects; I’m completing the terminal inventory and checking project-level MPN/package/datasheet metadata next.

Initial footprint inspection shows an RDG-style 6.5 × 7.5 mm body with 23 physical pads numbered through 24 (pin 22 omitted). I’m now verifying whether that omission and every pad assignment match TI’s official drawing.

Audit complete. The Datasheet URL was already set, so no update was needed; however, the part fails verification because symbol terminals and footprint pads 22 and 25 (both PGND) are missing, and all terminal types/descriptions are unspecified.

Full findings: TPSM8A28RDGR Part Audit Report. I also filed an internal part-quality report; the part should not be used in production until corrected.