I’ll audit the part metadata, locate the official datasheet if needed, update the Datasheet property, then cross-check the symbol pins and footprint against the manufacturer documentation.

I’m reconciling the completed audit against the live part data now, then I’ll close any remaining verification gaps and deliver the mismatch summary.

Audit reconciled and independently verified. The official Bel datasheet URL was already correctly set, so no property update was needed; the footprint matches the recommended hole pattern, but the symbol has critical errors: P7, P9, and P10 are incorrectly labeled NC, and P5 is mislabeled as a transmit rather than receive center tap.

Full specifications, pin-by-pin results, and mechanical dimensions are in the Part Audit. I also filed an internal part-quality report; the part should not be used from symbol names alone until these terminal definitions are corrected.