Part Audit Review

flux

The official-document and geometry cross-check is still running; I’m waiting for the full pin and footprint comparison before finalizing the audit.

flux

Audit complete. The Datasheet property was already populated, so it was not changed.
  • Critical footprint mismatch: signal pads are 0.28 × 2.27 mm instead of Samtec’s recommended 0.28 × 0.43 mm; row spacing is 5.74 mm instead of 4.70 mm.
  • Metadata issues: package code TO is incorrect; mount/type classifications are weak.
  • Symbol issues: all 88 terminals exist and map correctly, but lack pin types, descriptions, pair/bank grouping, and ground-plane identification.
  • Verified: 80 signals, 8 ground-plane tails, 2 alignment holes, 0.50 mm pitch, and correct overall body envelope.
Full evidence and official Samtec sources are in the Comprehensive Part Audit. I also filed a part-quality report with the Flux engineering team.
A

adrian95

Fix the signal pad length and row spacing to match the Samtec recommended footprint.

flux

Signal land length is corrected to 0.43 mm; I’m now moving the two rows inward to 4.70 mm center-to-center.

flux

Updated and verified the footprint:
  • All 80 signal pads are now 0.28 × 0.43 mm.
  • Pad rows are at Y = ±2.35 mm, giving 4.70 mm center-to-center spacing.
  • Ground-plane pads and alignment holes were unchanged.
  • No invalid-pad DRC issues were reported.
Sign up to send

Files

Pins

Symbol

Layout

3D View

Name
Pin #
Type
Section
Pin Group
Orientation
Order
Sub-symbol
1
1
Unspecified
2
2
Unspecified
3
3
Unspecified
4
4
Unspecified
5
5
Unspecified
6
6
Unspecified
7
7
Unspecified
8
8
Unspecified
9
9
Unspecified
10
10
Unspecified
11
11
Unspecified
12
12
Unspecified
13
13
Unspecified
14
14
Unspecified
15
15
Unspecified
16
16
Unspecified
17
17
Unspecified
18
18
Unspecified
19
19
Unspecified
20
20
Unspecified
21
21
Unspecified
22
22
Unspecified
23
23
Unspecified

QSH-040-01-F-D-DP-A-K-TR