Terminal Organization Review
Thought for 50 sec
Final read-only audit: Failed — 5 remaining naming mismatches
Exhaustive Figure 6/Table 7 comparison
Current latest commit is
Requested corrected balls
#14fbca23. No mutations were performed.Table
| Ball | Datasheet Rev. 1.2.1 | Current terminal | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| C4 | VSSQ | VSS | Mismatch |
| N2 | VSSQ | VSS | Mismatch |
| N5 | VSSQ | VSS | Mismatch |
| P4 | VSSQ | VSS | Mismatch |
| P6 | VSSQ | VSS | Mismatch |
| K9 | VCC | VCC (VCC::9ed3bda6 unique identifier) | Match |
| H5 | DS | DS | Match |
| K5 | RST_n | RST_n | Match |
- Terminal instances audited: 153
- Unique ball coordinates: 153
- Legal FBGA-153 coordinates: 153
- Missing balls: 0
- Duplicate balls: 0
- Invalid coordinates: 0
- Exact naming matches: 148
- Exact naming mismatches: 5
- NC classification errors: 0 — all 107 NC balls agree
- RFU classification errors: 0 — all 13 RFU balls agree
- Other interface, supply, and ground assignment errors: 0
- Footprint pads present: 153
Therefore, the requested claim of zero naming/electrical mismatches cannot be confirmed.
Corrected-pin property and mapping retention
For the eight specified balls, inspection confirms the original non-name metadata remains intact:
- C4, N2, N5, P4, P6: still in
Section=Ground,Pin Group=Ground,Pin Orientation=Bottom; pin numbers, terminal orders, symbol positions, types, and corresponding footprint pads remain present. Their names are still wrong. - K9: remains
Section=Power,Pin Group=Power,Pin Orientation=Top,Terminal Order=6, symbol position{x:93,y:364},Pin Type=Unspecified; corresponding pad was renamed with it. - H5: remains in
eMMC Interface, orientationRight, order11, symbol position{x:-93,y:400}, same type; corresponding pad isDS. - K5: remains in
eMMC Interface, orientationRight, order12, symbol position{x:-93,y:386}, same type; corresponding pad isRST_n.
Commit inspection shows
#14fbca23 renamed all eleven ground terminals back from VSSQ to VSS, which explains the five current discrepancies.Thought for 3 sec
Three corrections succeeded: K9→VCC, H5→DS, K5→RST_n. The platform cannot selectively rename five repeated
VSS terminals—it applies the rename to all eleven—so C4, N2, N5, P4, and P6 remain VSS instead of VSSQ; final verification is 148/153 exact, with no missing, duplicate, invalid, NC, or RFU errors.This selective-designator issue has been reported internally; fixing it now would require rebuilding the five terminal instances, which risks their footprint-pad mappings.
Fix and verify labels
Try alternative fix
Create audit note
Check footprint mapping
Re-run publish review
