Review complete. The project already had a Datasheet URL, so I did not update it; I documented the full cross-check in HR911130A Part Review.
Key flags:
Project description says 10/100Base-T, but the datasheet identifies HR911130A as 100/1000Base-T / IEEE 802.3ab.
Schematic LED pins 13 and 14 are polarity-swapped vs. datasheet: pin 13 should be Yellow cathode, pin 14 should be Yellow anode.
Footprint hole pattern matches the datasheet, but the footprint has 18 physical holes/pads while the symbol exposes 14 electrical terminals; shield/mechanical handling should be intentional.
Suggested next steps:
Fix the pin 13/14 LED labels/polarity.
Rename LED terminals to color-specific names.
Update the part description to 100/1000Base-T.
Decide whether shield tabs 15/16 should be schematic terminals.
I’ll update the LED terminal labels/polarity naming, revise the project description/spec wording, document shield-tab handling, then re-run the part review checks.
Done. I updated the description to 100/1000Base-T / IEEE 802.3ab, documented shield pads 15/16 and NPTH holes 17/18, and re-ran the review in HR911130A Part Review.
Open item:
Pin 14’s Pin Description is now correct as Yellow LED anode, but its visible terminal label still shows GREEN_CATHODE::18b70343 due to duplicate-label targeting behavior in the schematic editor.
Suggested next steps:
Manually rename pin 14’s visible label to YELLOW_ANODE in the symbol editor.
Optionally expose shield tabs 15/16 as schematic terminals if users need chassis/shield connectivity.