Audit complete. MPN, manufacturer, 49-terminal count, and pin mappings 1–48 are correct; the existing Datasheet property was already populated, so it was not changed.
Critical mismatches:
Footprint is rendered 1000× too small and is unusable for manufacturing.
Pin 49 is GND instead of TI’s EGP.
All pin types are Unspecified; descriptions and functional grouping are missing.
Package metadata is missing.
Full findings: CC1354P106T0RGZR Part Audit. I also filed an internal part-quality report for the footprint defect.
can you group together pins by their functions?
for example for Power, 3v3, gnd_1 gnd_2 etc
NOTE: If you group them, can you not add the same pin if you already added them in a group? You should know which pin function is common for its function.
I’ll organize every terminal into one broad functional group with no duplicates, using the TI pin functions as the source of truth, then verify all 49 pins are assigned exactly once.
Grouped and verified all 49 pins, with each pin assigned exactly once:
Power: 8 pins
Ground: 1 pin
RF: 7 pins
Clock: 4 pins
GPIO: 26 pins
Debug / Reset: 3 pins
Each pin’s Section matches its Pin Group, with consistent orientation and unique ordering. Pin names, numbers, footprint mappings, and electrical types were preserved.