Part Audit Review
Worked for 31 sec
The official Phoenix Contact datasheet is already attached, so no property change is needed. I’m now checking the 24 terminal definitions and the zigzag through-hole land pattern against its electrical and mechanical tables.
Worked for 3 mins 30 sec
Created a project doc
Part Audit Report
Part Audit Report
Identification and metadata
- Manufacturer: Phoenix Contact
- Order / item number: 1709788
- Product designation: MKDS 10 HV/12-ZB-10,16
- Description: 12-position, single-row, high-voltage PCB terminal block with screw connection and tension sleeve
- Designator prefix: J
- Mounting: Through-hole, wave soldering
- Datasheet: https://www.phoenixcontact.com/en-us/products/printed-circuit-board-terminal-mkds-10-hv12-zb-1016-1709788?type=pdf
- Datasheet status: Already present; no update was required.
- Pin/pad count in project: 24
- Package metadata: No conventional package/case code was found. The mechanical identity is the manufacturer-specific 12-position, 10.16 mm-pitch zigzag-W through-hole terminal-block footprint.
Audit complete. The official datasheet was already set, and the 24-pad zigzag footprint geometry generally matches Phoenix Contact’s drawing; however, the symbol incorrectly represents 24 independent pins instead of 12 potentials with two paired solder pins each. Pin descriptions are also missing, and the exact 1.5 mm plated drill/annular ring still needs direct footprint verification.
Full findings: Part Audit Report. I also filed an internal part-quality report for the symbol connectivity issue.
Fix and verify part
Fix symbol mapping
Verify footprint drills
Clean part metadata
Refine this doc
Ask about this doc
Part Audit Report
Identification and metadata
- Manufacturer: Phoenix Contact
- Order / item number: 1709788
- Product designation: MKDS 10 HV/12-ZB-10,16
- Description: 12-position, single-row, high-voltage PCB terminal block with screw connection and tension sleeve
- Designator prefix: J
- Mounting: Through-hole, wave soldering
- Datasheet: https://www.phoenixcontact.com/en-us/products/printed-circuit-board-terminal-mkds-10-hv12-zb-1016-1709788?type=pdf
- Datasheet status: Already present; no update was required.
- Pin/pad count in project: 24
- Package metadata: No conventional package/case code was found. The mechanical identity is the manufacturer-specific 12-position, 10.16 mm-pitch zigzag-W through-hole terminal-block footprint.
Key manufacturer specifications
Table
| Parameter | Datasheet value |
|---|---|
| Positions / connections / potentials | 12 / 12 / 12 |
| Solder pins | 24 total; 2 per potential |
| Pitch | 10.16 mm |
| Pin layout | Zigzag pinning W |
| Nominal current | 76 A |
| Nominal voltage | 1000 V |
| Rated voltage III/3 | 800 V |
| Rated surge voltage | 8 kV |
| Nominal conductor cross-section | 16 mm² |
| Conductor range | 0.5–16 mm², AWG 20–6 |
| Tightening torque | 1.2–1.5 Nm |
| Stripping length | 10 mm |
| Housing color / material | Green (6021), PA, UL 94 V-0 |
| Body width × depth × height | 121.92 × 18.7 × 35.8 mm |
| Installed height | 30.8 mm |
| Solder pin length | 5 mm |
| Pin size | 1.0 × 0.9 mm |
| Recommended PCB hole | 1.5 mm |
Schematic symbol review
Matches
- The project exposes 24 physical solder terminals, numbered 1–24.
- The terminal count matches the datasheet's 24 solder pins.
Mismatches / risks
- Electrical representation is incorrect or incomplete. The datasheet defines 12 electrical potentials, with two solder pins internally belonging to each potential. The current symbol exposes 24 independently numbered terminals and does not encode the pairs (1–2, 3–4, …, 23–24) as the same electrical connection or intentional duplicate/jumper pins. A user could route the two physical pins of one terminal as unrelated signals.
- Pin descriptions are absent. All terminal descriptions are undefined and pin type is
Unspecified. At minimum, each should identify its potential and mate, e.g.Potential 1, solder pin A/B. - Part-level pin semantics should be 12 logical connections. Preferred representation is either a 12-pin symbol mapped to paired footprint pads, or 24 visible pins with duplicate electrical numbers/pairing metadata and the intentional-jumper setting enabled.
Footprint review
Matches
- 24 through-hole pads are present.
- Pad centers follow the datasheet zigzag-W pattern: 10.16 mm position pitch, 4.00 mm stagger, and 10.16 mm row separation.
- Pairing by position is geometrically consistent: (1,2), (3,4), …, (23,24).
- The body outline is approximately 121.92 mm × 18.7 mm, matching the manufacturer dimensions.
- The datasheet calls for 1.5 mm PCB holes and 1.0 × 0.9 mm pins.
Unverified details
- The available footprint inspection did not expose exact copper annular-ring size, pad shape, plated-hole flag, or complete layer tuple. The 1.5 mm drill diameter must be confirmed directly in the footprint editor before manufacturing.
- Courtyard/fabrication outline details were not available in the indexed inspection.
Property review and metadata issues
- Manufacturer and item/order number are correct.
- The stored datasheet URL is official and valid.
- The description substantially matches the official product data.
- The manufacturer calls
1709788the item/order number; the actual product designation isMKDS 10 HV/12-ZB-10,16. Using 1709788 as the Manufacturer Part Number is common and sourceable, but recording the product designation in the description/name is important. - Package/case metadata is missing or nonstandard; it should describe the 12-position, 10.16 mm pitch, zigzag-W, through-hole footprint rather than
Screw. - If present, a
Compliance = Greenproperty is semantically wrong: green is the housing color, not a compliance classification.
Conclusion
The mechanical pad count and zigzag placement appear consistent with the official Phoenix Contact drawing, but the schematic electrical model is not safe as currently represented because it models 24 independent connections instead of 12 paired potentials. Correct the pin-to-pad mapping/pair semantics and verify the 1.5 mm plated drill plus annular ring before using the part in a board.
Identification and metadata
Key manufacturer specifications
Schematic symbol review
Matches
Mismatches / risks
Footprint review
Matches
Unverified details
Property review and metadata issues
Conclusion
