• Terminal
    Terminal
    An electrical connector acting as reusable interface to a conductor and creating a point where external circuits can be connected.
  • Ground
    A common return path for electric current. Commonly known as ground.
  • Net Portal
    A net identifier used to create connectivity to other Net Portal with the same designator. #portal
  • Power Net Portal
    Power net portal is a special schematic object used to define a power or ground net. Power ports allow you to conveniently indicate a power net at any location in the design. Power nets of the same designator automatically connect throughout your design #portal #power
  • Generic Resistor
    A generic fixed resistor for rapid developing circuit topology. Save precious design time by seamlessly add more information to this part (value, footprint, etc.) as it becomes available. Standard resistor values: 1.0Ω 10Ω 100Ω 1.0kΩ 10kΩ 100kΩ 1.0MΩ 1.1Ω 11Ω 110Ω 1.1kΩ 11kΩ 110kΩ 1.1MΩ 1.2Ω 12Ω 120Ω 1.2kΩ 12kΩ 120kΩ 1.2MΩ 1.3Ω 13Ω 130Ω 1.3kΩ 13kΩ 130kΩ 1.3MΩ 1.5Ω 15Ω 150Ω 1.5kΩ 15kΩ 150kΩ 1.5MΩ 1.6Ω 16Ω 160Ω 1.6kΩ 16kΩ 160kΩ 1.6MΩ 1.8Ω 18Ω 180Ω 1.8KΩ 18kΩ 180kΩ 1.8MΩ 2.0Ω 20Ω 200Ω 2.0kΩ 20kΩ 200kΩ 2.0MΩ 2.2Ω 22Ω 220Ω 2.2kΩ 22kΩ 220kΩ 2.2MΩ 2.4Ω 24Ω 240Ω 2.4kΩ 24kΩ 240kΩ 2.4MΩ 2.7Ω 27Ω 270Ω 2.7kΩ 27kΩ 270kΩ 2.7MΩ 3.0Ω 30Ω 300Ω 3.0KΩ 30KΩ 300KΩ 3.0MΩ 3.3Ω 33Ω 330Ω 3.3kΩ 33kΩ 330kΩ 3.3MΩ 3.6Ω 36Ω 360Ω 3.6kΩ 36kΩ 360kΩ 3.6MΩ 3.9Ω 39Ω 390Ω 3.9kΩ 39kΩ 390kΩ 3.9MΩ 4.3Ω 43Ω 430Ω 4.3kΩ 43KΩ 430KΩ 4.3MΩ 4.7Ω 47Ω 470Ω 4.7kΩ 47kΩ 470kΩ 4.7MΩ 5.1Ω 51Ω 510Ω 5.1kΩ 51kΩ 510kΩ 5.1MΩ 5.6Ω 56Ω 560Ω 5.6kΩ 56kΩ 560kΩ 5.6MΩ 6.2Ω 62Ω 620Ω 6.2kΩ 62KΩ 620KΩ 6.2MΩ 6.8Ω 68Ω 680Ω 6.8kΩ 68kΩ 680kΩ 6.8MΩ 7.5Ω 75Ω 750Ω 7.5kΩ 75kΩ 750kΩ 7.5MΩ 8.2Ω 82Ω 820Ω 8.2kΩ 82kΩ 820kΩ 8.2MΩ 9.1Ω 91Ω 910Ω 9.1kΩ 91kΩ 910kΩ 9.1MΩ #generics #CommonPartsLibrary
  • Generic Capacitor
    A generic fixed capacitor for rapid developing circuit topology. Save precious design time by seamlessly add more information to this part (value, footprint, etc.) as it becomes available. Standard capacitor values: 1.0pF 10pF 100pF 1000pF 0.01uF 0.1uF 1.0uF 10uF 100uF 1000uF 10,000uF 1.1pF 11pF 110pF 1100pF 1.2pF 12pF 120pF 1200pF 1.3pF 13pF 130pF 1300pF 1.5pF 15pF 150pF 1500pF 0.015uF 0.15uF 1.5uF 15uF 150uF 1500uF 1.6pF 16pF 160pF 1600pF 1.8pF 18pF 180pF 1800pF 2.0pF 20pF 200pF 2000pF 2.2pF 22pF 20pF 2200pF 0.022uF 0.22uF 2.2uF 22uF 220uF 2200uF 2.4pF 24pF 240pF 2400pF 2.7pF 27pF 270pF 2700pF 3.0pF 30pF 300pF 3000pF 3.3pF 33pF 330pF 3300pF 0.033uF 0.33uF 3.3uF 33uF 330uF 3300uF 3.6pF 36pF 360pF 3600pF 3.9pF 39pF 390pF 3900pF 4.3pF 43pF 430pF 4300pF 4.7pF 47pF 470pF 4700pF 0.047uF 0.47uF 4.7uF 47uF 470uF 4700uF 5.1pF 51pF 510pF 5100pF 5.6pF 56pF 560pF 5600pF 6.2pF 62pF 620pF 6200pF 6.8pF 68pF 680pF 6800pF 0.068uF 0.68uF 6.8uF 68uF 680uF 6800uF 7.5pF 75pF 750pF 7500pF 8.2pF 82pF 820pF 8200pF 9.1pF 91pF 910pF 9100pF #generics #CommonPartsLibrary
  • Generic Inductor
    A generic fixed inductor for rapid developing circuit topology. *You can now change the footprint and 3D model at the top level anytime you want. This is the power of #generics
  • RMCF0805JT47K0
    47 kOhms ±5% 0.125W, 1/8W Chip Resistor 0805 (2012 Metric) Automotive AEC-Q200 Thick Film #forLedBlink
  • 875105359001
    10uF Capacitor Aluminum Polymer 20% 16V SMD 5x5.3mm #forLedBlink #commonpartslibrary #capacitor #aluminumpolymer #radialcan
  • CTL1206FYW1T
    Yellow 595nm LED Indication - Discrete 1.7V 1206 (3216 Metric) #forLedBlink

SC - Exploration

SC - Exploration
Description

Created
March 8th 2024
Last updated by nico
a year ago
1 Contributor(s)
nico

Controls

Properties

Sensors
High-precision temperature sensor, PM2.5 sensor, VOC sensor, and CO2 sensor.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Power Requirements
Rechargeable battery with a USB-C charging port.
Accuracy
Temperature sensor accuracy of ±0.5°C, PM2.5 sensor accuracy within ±10 µg/m³
Battery Life
Minimum of 30 days on a single charge under normal usage.
Operating Temperature
-10°C to 50°C
Humidity
10% to 90% non-condensing
Capacitor Derating
Derate max voltage to 60%
Resistor Tolerance
All resistors should be 1%

Availability & Pricing

DistributorQty 1

Assets

    Simulation

    µs

    Simulation Speed

    brainstorm a few architecture options for this project. Provide relevant options...
    @copilot brainstorm a few architecture options for this project. Provide relevant options when available. Compare all options in terms of total BoM cost and time to market. Particularly consider:

    • Should I use modules or standalone MCUs?
    • What's the right MCU architecture MCU for this project?
    • Do I need a full-featured PMIC or individual power converters?
    10mo
    For the Vital Blue Wall-E project, given its specifications and requirements for measuring temperature, air quality (PM2.5, VOC, CO2), and providing data connectivity (Wi-Fi), alongside considerations for portability, ease of installation, and user-friendliness, several architecture options can be evaluated. We'll focus on the MCU choice (whether to go with modules or standalone MCUs), the right MCU architecture, and the power management strategy (full-featured PMIC vs. individual power converters).
    1. Modules vs. Standalone MCUs
    Modules:

    • Pros:

      • Faster time to market due to reduced design complexity and pre-certified Wi-Fi capabilities, reducing the effort required for RF design and regulatory approval.
      • Simplify PCB design since modules contain most necessary supporting circuitry.
    • Cons:

      • Higher BOM cost compared to standalone MCUs.
      • Less flexibility in terms of selecting specific components to optimize power consumption or cost.
    Standalone MCUs:

    • Pros:

      • Lower BOM cost due to the ability to select specific components tailored to application requirements.
      • Greater design flexibility, allowing for optimized power management and form factor.
    • Cons:

      • Longer time to market due to the need for more complex PCB design and RF design if incorporating Wi-Fi directly, alongside the requirement for regulatory certification.
      • Requires more in-depth technical knowledge for system integration and power management.
    2. MCU Architecture
    For IoT applications focusing on data acquisition from sensors and Wi-Fi connectivity, both ARM Cortex-M and ESP32 (a product of Espressif Systems) architectures are suitable:
    ARM Cortex-M (e.g., M4, M7):

    • Pros:

      • Wide availability from various manufacturers, offering flexibility in choosing the right balance of power consumption and processing capability.
      • Extensive support for development tools and libraries.
    • Cons:

      • May require additional components for Wi-Fi connectivity, affecting BOM cost and design complexity.
    ESP32:

    • Pros:

      • Integrated Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, facilitating connectivity requirements with a single chip, reducing BOM cost and simplifying design.
      • Low power consumption modes available, important for meeting the battery life requirement.
      • Affordable and widely supported by a robust development community.
    • Cons:

      • Less variety in terms of processing capabilities compared to the vast offerings of ARM Cortex-M.
    3. Power Management
    Full-featured PMIC:

    • Pros:

      • Simplifies power supply design by integrating multiple power rails required for the MCU, sensors, and other peripherals in one package.
      • Often includes power-saving features that can help meet battery life requirements.
    • Cons:

      • Higher BOM cost.
      • Potentially over-specified for the project's needs.
    Individual Power Converters:

    • Pros:

      • Allows for more granular optimization of power efficiency for each component, potentially extending battery life.
      • Can be more cost-effective if the design does not require the full feature set of a PMIC.
    • Cons:

      • Increases design complexity, possibly impacting time to market.
      • Requires careful selection and design to ensure compatibility and meet performance/efficiency goals.
    Conclusion
    Choosing between modules or standalone MCUs, the right MCU architecture, and the power management approach heavily depends on prioritizing either BOM cost or time to market.

    • For faster time to market with slightly higher BOM cost, using a module (like one based on ESP32) combined with a full-featured PMIC offers a balanced approach.
    • For a lower BOM cost with a longer time to market due to design complexity, selecting a standalone MCU, possibly ARM Cortex-M with discrete power management components, would be more appropriate.
    Considering all factors, using an ESP32 module (or similar) with integrated Wi-Fi might offer an optimal balance for Vital Blue Wall-E, aligning with the project's requirements while mindful of development resource constraints and market timelines.
    10mo
    We've decided to use a Cortex-M MCU, paired with individual power converters. Please provide a few part options with MPNs.
    10mo
    Selecting a Cortex-M MCU for the Vital Blue Wall-E project, alongside individual power converters to optimize power management, involves considering various parameters such as power efficiency, processing power, connectivity options, and available peripherals for sensor integration. Below are a few parts that align well with your project requirements, considering the need for precise sensor data acquisition and power sensitivity given the battery life goal.
    Cortex-M MCU Options

    1. STM32L476RG - STMicroelectronics

      • MPN: STM32L476RGT6
      • Features: ARM Cortex-M4 core, 80 MHz, 1 MB Flash, 128 KB SRAM, low power consumption, and a range of peripherals including ADCs and DACs, suitable for sensor interfacing.
      • Pros: Good balance between processing power and power efficiency, extensive low-power modes.
      • Cons: Requires external Wi-Fi module for connectivity.
    2. NXP LPC54628J512 - NXP Semiconductors

      • MPN: LPC54628J512ET180E
      • Features: ARM Cortex-M4 core, 180 MHz, 512 KB Flash, 200 KB SRAM, FlexComm interfaces for versatile peripheral connections.
      • Pros: Higher processing capability, versatile peripheral connection options.
      • Cons: Like the STM32 option, requires an external module for Wi-Fi connectivity.
    3. STM32L4R5ZI - STMicroelectronics

      • MPN: STM32L4R5ZIT6
      • Features: ARM Cortex-M4 core with FPU, 120 MHz, 2 MB Flash, 640 KB SRAM, advanced power-saving features.
      • Pros: Extensive memory resources and energy-efficient operations.
      • Cons: Higher cost, requires external connectivity modules.
    Individual Power Converter Options
    For efficient power conversion catering to the precise needs of MCUs and sensors, individual power converters are chosen:

    1. TPS62203 - Texas Instruments

      • MPN: TPS62203DBVR
      • Features: 2.25 MHz, 300 mA Step-Down Converter in SOT-23, high-efficiency power conversion.
      • Pros: High efficiency, small footprint.
      • Cons: Limited to 300 mA output current, suitable for low-power applications.
    2. MCP1700 - Microchip Technology

      • MPN: MCP1700-3302E/TO
      • Features: Low Quiescent Current LDO, 250 mA, adjustable and fixed voltage options.
      • Pros: Very low dropout voltage enhances battery life.
      • Cons: Limited by current output, best for low consumption devices.
    3. LM3671 - Texas Instruments

      • MPN: LM3671MF-3.3/NOPB
      • Features: 600 mA, 2 MHz Step-Down DC-DC Converter, high-efficiency conversion, small package.
      • Pros: Supports higher current demands, flexible for varied applications.
      • Cons: Slightly larger footprint than the TPS62203.
    When selecting components, consider the power requirements of the entire system, including the MCU, sensors, and any additional modules like Wi-Fi connectivity, to ensure the selected power converters meet these needs. Integration of these components will require careful planning of the PCB layout to optimize for power efficiency and signal integrity, especially considering the compact and user-friendly design goals of the Vital Blue Wall-E project.
    10mo
    Certainly! Below is a simplified block diagram for the Vital Blue Wall-E project utilizing a Cortex-M MCU and individual power converters, represented in Mermaid format. This diagram will help visualize the main components and their connections within the project. Note that this outlines a high-level view focusing on the MCU, power management, and key peripherals.
    Explanation:

    • Cortex-M MCU: Centers around the selected Cortex-M microcontroller unit (MCU), which will control the sensors and manage data communication via the Wi-Fi module.
    • Power Management: Shows the battery as the main power source, connected to individual power converters that distribute regulated voltage levels to the MCU, sensors, and Wi-Fi module. Also, it displays USB-C port connection to a battery charger, feeding the battery.
    • Sensors: Represents the high-precision sensors for temperature, PM2.5, VOC, and CO2. These are interfaced with the MCU for data collection.
    • Connectivity: Illustrates the Wi-Fi module connected to the MCU for data transfer to a mobile app or web interface.
    The diagram simplifies complex interactions to focus on critical system components and their relationships. Fine-tuning might be needed based on the detailed specifications of each component and additional considerations like the Wi-Fi module's connection protocol or specific power requirements of each sensor.
    10mo
    Generate a block diagram for this architecture in mermaid format.
    10mo
    Below you'll find a refined version of the block diagram focused on the Vital Blue Wall-E architecture. This version provides a cleaner visualization of the system's design, highlighting the connections between the Cortex-M MCU, individual power converters, sensors, and the Wi-Fi module. This is presented in Mermaid format for integration and visualization in documentation or development tools supporting the Mermaid syntax.

    Image


    Connectivity
    Power Management
    Sensors
    Power In
    Charging
    3.3V
    3.3V
    Data
    Data
    I2C/SPI
    I2C/SPI
    I2C/SPI
    I2C/SPI
    Wifi Module
    Power Converters
    Temperature Sensor
    PM2.5 Sensor
    VOC Sensor
    CO2 Sensor
    Battery
    USB-C Port
    Cortex-M MCU
    Sensors
    Explanation of the Diagram:

    • Battery: Acts as the primary power source of the system.
    • USB-C Port: This is used for charging the battery, ensuring that the device can be easily recharged when needed.
    • Power Converters (PMIC): These individual power converters receive power from the battery and provide regulated voltage levels to the MCU, sensors, and the Wi-Fi module. Different components might require different voltage levels, hence the selection of individual converters.
    • Cortex-M MCU: The core controller of the system, interfacing with the sensors for data collection and the Wi-Fi module for data communication.
    • Sensors: Designated sensor blocks for temperature, PM2.5, VOC, and CO2. Each of these sensors connects to the MCU using communication protocols like I2C or SPI, depending on the exact model and capabilities of the sensors.
    • Wi-Fi Module: Provides internet connectivity to the MCU, enabling the transmission of sensor data to a remote server or an app for user access.
    This diagram should serve as a conceptual overview of your system architecture, simplifying the relationships between the main components and their interactions. Visualizing the architecture in this way aids in both the project planning phases and discussions with team members or stakeholders regarding system design and functionality.
    10mo
    Someone is typing...
    Checks that the power traveling across a given resistor is under its rating with 50% headroom.
    Learn more
    Checks that IC pins that require pull up or pull down resistors have them.
    Learn more
    Checks that capacitors have appropriate voltage ratings to prevent overheating and ensure reliable circuit operation.
    Checks that all parts have a part number and are available from distributors.
    Reports copper elements that are shorting.
    Reports parts that have no footprint.
    Reports nodes that are assigned to a layer that doesn't exist in the layout stackup.
    Reports components that have been modified using the "!important" flag.
    Reports terminals that are not connected properly. NOTE: Only connections to the center of pads are considered valid.
    Reports nodes that are using rules that are not supported anymore.
    Reports layers that have multiple copper fills of different nets. Make sure the Connected Layers rule value of nets with fills is valid.
    Detect any via, trace or copper fill island that is not connected to any net.