Before selecting it, I need two requirements that materially affect the choice:
Maximum current required on 1.8 V and 3.3 V
Whether the replacement must fit the existing 3 × 3 mm VSON-10 footprint, or whether a PCB redesign is acceptable
My default recommendation would be a modern dual-output buck with both outputs resistor-adjustable, 5 V input support, independent enables, and at least ~1 A per rail. Send the two current requirements and confirm whether the footprint may change.
I’ll verify whether the TPS62400 is a true pin-compatible VSON-10 replacement and confirm it supports 500 mA per rail with independently adjustable 1.8 V and 3.3 V outputs.
There is no true same-footprint TPS6240x replacement that supports 500 mA continuous on both rails: the VSON-10 family—including TPS62400—is rated approximately 400 mA on channel 1 and 600 mA on channel 2.
If the 1.8 V rail can stay below 400 mA, select TPS62400DRCT; it provides two adjustable outputs in the same 3 × 3 mm VSON-10 package.
If both rails genuinely require 500 mA continuous, the footprint must change to a higher-current dual buck. Full-load input demand is approximately 570 mA at 5 V assuming 90% efficiency, so I’d size the input source for at least 750 mA.
Create a best-effort Flux schematic from the uploaded GZ-TU-REV2_sch.png reference image for the NF-UNIVERSAL ALARM circuit.
Architecture
Diagram
Required named nets
VCC
GND
RAW
BATTERYCUTOFF
TRIP
OUTPUT
Reconstruction policy
Use exact visible designators where readable. Use common Flux library parts for U1, U2, U3, Q1, and Q2 where the image is unclear. Use generic passives with the visible values and add notes where confidence is limited.
Verification notes
This schematic is image-derived and must be checked against the original CAD/BOM before fabrication.