ESP32-C3 Multi-Board Design


Placed 36 component(s): C7, C1, J4, U2, C14, C2, C3, R4, C4, U1, L1, J9, C12, J6, C11, D1, R2, R7, R5, R3, J8, U4, J5, J3, R6, J7, C6, C5, J10, U5, J2, U3, F1, R1, J1, C13
Work done
  • Updated the schematic into a dual-board stack concept: primary board keeps ESP32-C3, TMP117, LIS2DW12, and J8; secondary board carries LiPo charging/power, pogo access, external antenna interface, and J9/J10.
  • Added and wired the J8/J9 board-to-board interconnect and J10 U.FL antenna interface; core ERC checks are passing.
  • Reconfigured the PCB into a two-board 28 mm-wide stack/panel representation and re-placed the components into primary/secondary clusters.
  • Documented the partition, interconnect pinout, verification state, and manual-routing priorities in Two-Board Stack Revision.
Success criteria review
  • ✅ Dual-board partition defined and reflected in schematic/component roles.
  • ✅ Core functions preserved: ESP-NOW MCU, TMP117, LIS2DW12, LiPo charging/power, and pogo access remain connected.
  • ⚠️ Layout de-risked but not fully clean: missing footprints and ERC checks pass, but remaining physical-layout issues still need routing/layer cleanup before fabrication.
Next steps
  • Refresh/regenerate routing for the new two-board placement, then clear the remaining physical layout issues before manufacturing export.
Check DRC issues
Export assembly files
Show interconnect pinout
Document routing priorities

Execution Plan Revision — External Antenna Readiness
Revision Objective
Revise the current compact ESP32-C3 sensor-node project so the design now captures support for an external antenna connector as a present requirement rather than a future option. The revision should remain high-level and focus on requirements, scope control, and layout priorities rather than implementation details.
Baseline Constraints to Preserve
  • Maintain a circular PCB concept.
  • Keep the preferred board diameter at 28 mm.
  • Keep the absolute board diameter limit under 30 mm.
  • Preserve the existing temperature sensing function.
  • Preserve the existing accelerometer function.
  • Preserve LiPo charging capability.
  • Preserve pogo-pad charging and programming access.
  • Preserve the single-board sensor-node product direction.
Revised Primary Requirement
  • Replace the current antenna approach with an external-antenna-capable approach now, so future deployment is not blocked by RF range, orientation, or enclosure constraints.
Requirements Capture Additions
RF / Antenna
  • Define external antenna support as an explicit project requirement.
  • Capture connector access, edge placement, cable clearance, and serviceability expectations.
  • Capture any enclosure, fixture, and user-access constraints introduced by the antenna connector.
  • Treat RF path integrity and connector accessibility as top-level layout drivers.
Mechanical / Form Factor
  • Confirm that external antenna support must fit within the existing compact circular product concept.
  • Revalidate that all required functions still fit within the 28 mm target and under the 30 mm maximum diameter.
  • Reserve board-edge priority for the antenna connector and associated RF region.
Sensor Preservation
  • Preserve the TMP117 temperature sensing intent and protect it from added thermal and RF placement pressure.
  • Preserve the accelerometer and ensure its placement is not compromised by the revised RF requirements.
  • Maintain thermal isolation between the temperature sensing area and heat-generating circuitry.
Power / Access
  • Preserve LiPo charging architecture and user charging workflow.
  • Preserve pogo-pad accessibility for charging and programming.
  • Ensure the antenna revision does not reduce usability of the battery, pogo interface, or sensor functions.
Updated PCB Placement and Layout Priorities
  1. RF edge priority first
    • Assign highest placement priority to the external antenna connector and its required board-edge access.
    • Protect the RF region from later crowding by secondary functions.
  2. Thermal sensing integrity second
    • Preserve a distinct thermal sensing zone for the temperature sensor.
    • Keep charger, regulator, and other heat-generating blocks away from the temperature sensing region.
  3. Core functional retention third
    • Retain accelerometer, LiPo charging, battery connection, and pogo-pad access without functional regression.
  4. Form-factor compliance throughout
    • Use the under-30 mm diameter limit as a standing gate for every placement tradeoff.
High-Level Execution Plan
Phase 1 — Re-baseline Requirements
  • Update the project requirements to make external antenna support mandatory.
  • Document what must remain unchanged: temperature sensor, accelerometer, LiPo charging, pogo pads, and compact circular form factor.
  • Define success criteria for fitting the revised design within the existing size target.
Phase 2 — Feasibility Review
  • Review whether the current board concept can accommodate external antenna access while preserving all retained functions.
  • Identify any board-edge, connector-access, or sensor-isolation conflicts at the requirements level.
  • Decide whether the 28 mm target remains achievable or whether contingency up to the 30 mm maximum is needed.
Phase 3 — Placement Strategy Update
  • Reorder placement priorities around RF edge access first and thermal isolation second.
  • Reconfirm zoning for RF, thermal sensing, power management, and pogo access.
  • Capture which subsystems are fixed in concept and which may shift to create space.
Phase 4 — Project Scope Lock
  • Freeze the retained subsystem list and the revised antenna requirement.
  • Record any new mechanical or enclosure dependencies created by the antenna connector.
  • Define what is out of scope for this revision to avoid feature creep.
Phase 5 — Review Gate
  • Perform a high-level review to confirm the revised requirements are internally consistent.
  • Confirm that external antenna support, thermal sensing quality, charging access, and compact diameter goals can coexist before moving into detailed implementation.
Key Decisions Needed
  • Whether the design must remain exactly 28 mm or may expand up to the stated sub-30 mm limit if needed.
  • What connector-access expectations must be supported at the product level.
  • Whether RF edge access takes precedence over previous component placements when conflicts arise.
  • What acceptance criteria define adequate thermal isolation for the temperature sensor after the antenna-related rework.
Out of Scope for This Revision
  • Detailed RF matching or routing instructions.
  • Specific connector footprint selection.
  • Detailed component relocation steps.
  • Final implementation-level layout decisions.
  • Revision Objective

  • Baseline Constraints to Preserve

  • Revised Primary Requirement

  • Requirements Capture Additions

  • RF / Antenna

  • Mechanical / Form Factor

  • Sensor Preservation

  • Power / Access

  • Updated PCB Placement and Layout Priorities

  • High-Level Execution Plan

  • Phase 1 — Re-baseline Requirements

  • Phase 2 — Feasibility Review

  • Phase 3 — Placement Strategy Update

  • Phase 4 — Project Scope Lock

  • Phase 5 — Review Gate

  • Key Decisions Needed

  • Out of Scope for This Revision