Part Information Review

flux

I reviewed the part project for TDA4VM88TGCALFRQ1.
  • The official datasheet URL is already set to TI: https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/TDA4VM-Q1, so I did not change that.
  • For this kind of audit, the key checks are: use the datasheet as source of truth, verify exact pin-count match, and verify symbol terminals align with footprint pads
Summary

Table

AreaResult
MPNTDA4VM88TGCALFRQ1
ManufacturerTexas Instruments
Datasheet URLPresent and official TI URL
Package from TIFCBGA (ALF)
Package size24 mm x 24 mm
Pitch0.8 mm
Pin/ball count from TI827
Schematic terminal count827
PCB pad count827
Footprint count in layout1
Internal symbol/footprint count consistencyMatch
Pin Number propertyAppears populated on reviewed terminals
Pin Type propertyPresent, but currently Unspecified on reviewed terminals
Key specs
From TI’s official product/datasheet pages:
  • Automotive ADAS / autonomous-vehicle SoC
  • Dual Arm Cortex-A72
  • 6x Arm Cortex-R5F
  • C7x DSP
  • GPU
  • Up to 8 TOPS AI acceleration
  • Operating temperature listed by TI as -40 C to 125 C
  • Package: 827-pin FCBGA (ALF), 24 mm x 24 mm, 0.8 mm pitch
  • TI marks Q1 variants as AEC-Q100 qualified
Cross-check results What matches
  • Pin count matches exactly: the project has 827 terminals and the layout has 827 pads, which matches TI’s 827-pin/ball package listing. That is the most important structural check in a part project audit
  • The PCB footprint naming is consistent with the package:
    • footprint asset indicates BGA827...
    • project layout shows a single footprint
  • Sampled terminal names and pad names appear internally consistent.
Gaps / issues flagged
  • Pin Type metadata is not properly classified. The terminals I inspected all had Pin Type: Unspecified.
    • For an IC/SoC part like this, that is a metadata gap. The recommended audit flow is to assign concrete pin types from the datasheet rather than leave them unspecified
  • I did not see evidence that richer symbol metadata has been filled in, such as:
    • Pin Description
    • Section
    • Pin Group
    • Pin Orientation
    • Sub-symbol Designator Suffix These are especially important for large IC-style parts to make the symbol usable and readable
  • Your visible project properties currently include:
    • Datasheet URL
    • Designator Prefix
    • Manufacturer Part Number
    • Manufacturer Name
  • I do not currently see project-level properties like:
    • Part Type
    • Package or Case Code
    • Operating Voltage
    • Operating Temperature
    • Implementation Details
Mismatches found
No hard mismatch found yet in:
  • MPN
  • manufacturer
  • datasheet URL
  • package ball count vs symbol count
  • package ball count vs footprint pad count
Main concern
The project looks structurally correct, but semantically incomplete:
  • correct package/count
  • but symbol pin metadata is still too generic to be high quality
If you want, I can do the next pass and fill in the missing project properties plus classify all pins from the datasheet.
Classify all pins
Add missing properties
Check footprint details
Sign up to send

Refine this doc
Ask about this doc
Doc 1

Documents

    Doc 1

Assets

stp

TDA4VM88TGCALFRQ1

TDA4VM88TGCALFRQ1.stp3D Model
image.png

image.png

imageThumbnail
kicad_mod

TDA4VM88TGCALFRQ1

BGA827C80P29X29_2400X2400X280.kicad_modFootprint
TDA4VM88TGCALFRQ1

TDA4VM88TGCALFRQ1

TDA4VM88TGCALFRQ1 Symbol.svgDefault

TDA4VM88TGCALFRQ1

TDA4VM88TGCALFRQ1 thumbnail
Microprocessors - MPU Dual Arm Cortex -A7 2 SoC and C7x DSP wi DISC-BY-MFG-03/25 Microprocessors - MPU Automotive system-on -a-chip for L2 L3 a TDA4VM88TGCALFR

Properties

TDA4VM88TGCALFRQ1

Texas Instruments

Integrated Circuit

ti.com/lit/gpn/TDA4VM-Q1

IC

Integrated Circuit

Parametric

Pricing & Availability

See prices from popular manufacturers for your project.

Controls