Part Information Review and Update
Thought for 2 mins 32 sec
I reviewed the part project and cross-checked it against the official Phoenix Contact datasheet.
Status
- The project now has the official Datasheet property set to: Phoenix Contact 1759059 PDF
- I checked the project properties, symbol terminals, PCB footprint metadata, and review checks.
- I also searched the uploaded-file index, but it did not return any matching file content for this part.
For MSTB 2,5/ 6-G-5,08 / Phoenix Contact 1759059:
Table
| Field | Datasheet value |
|---|---|
| Type | PCB header |
| Positions | 6 |
| Rows | 1 |
| Pitch | 5.08 mm |
| Current rating | 12 A |
| Voltage rating | 320 V nominal, up to 630 V in category II/2 |
| Contact style | Pin |
| Mounting | Wave soldering |
| Orientation | Plug-in direction parallel to PCB |
| Contact material | Cu alloy |
| Finish | Tin plated |
| Housing | PA, green |
| Width | 30.48 mm |
| Height | 11.8 mm |
| Length | 12 mm |
| Pin size | 1 mm x 1 mm |
| Recommended hole diameter | 1.4 mm |
- Description broadly matches the datasheet:
- 6-position
- 5.08 mm pitch
- right-angle / parallel-to-PCB style
- through-hole header style
- The footprint metadata shows 6 pads, which matches the datasheet.
- The footprint text
CONN_1759059_PXCaligns with Phoenix Contact 1759059. - The 3D model/asset naming suggests the MSTBA/MSTB 2,5 family, which is consistent with the datasheet family.
This is the main issue.
Table
| Source | Value |
|---|---|
| Project MPN property | 1757284 |
| Footprint text / official datasheet used | 1759059 |
That means the project currently mixes two different Phoenix Contact order codes. The geometry/family looks close, but the exact MPN is inconsistent and should be corrected.
2. Missing manufacturer property
- I did not find an explicit Manufacturer Name property in the indexed part data.
- It should be set to Phoenix Contact for a clean part definition.
- I did not find a dedicated package/property field describing the package or series.
- A useful value would be something like:
- MSTB 2,5/..-G family
- or 6-position 5.08 mm right-angle THT PCB header
- The symbol terminals only contain pin numbers.
- I did not find explicit pin names or pin descriptions for 1 through 6.
- For this connector, simple numeric pins may be acceptable, but if you want a fully documented part, adding descriptions like
Position 1...Position 6would improve completeness.
- All six symbol terminals are marked Pin Type: Unspecified.
- Not necessarily wrong for a connector, but not ideal for a polished part definition.
What I could confirm:
- 6 pads present
- footprint/3D metadata strongly indicates the right Phoenix Contact family
- naming suggests a 5.08 mm, 6-position, right-angle THT header
What I could not fully verify from the available layout data:
- exact pad-to-pad coordinate geometry
- exact hole size and courtyard/body outline dimensions versus the datasheet drawing
So the footprint appears plausibly correct, but I can only fully confirm identity-level consistency, not every mechanical dimension, from the currently exposed tool data.
Review summary
Table
| Area | Result |
|---|---|
| Datasheet property | OK |
| Pin count | OK |
| Symbol terminal count | OK |
| Footprint pad count | OK |
| Description | Mostly matches |
| Exact MPN consistency | Mismatch |
| Manufacturer property | Missing / not confirmed |
| Pin descriptions | Missing |
| Pin types | Unspecified |
The highest-priority correction is to resolve whether this part should be:
- 1757284, or
- 1759059
Right now, the project metadata and the datasheet/footprint evidence do not agree.
If you want, I can next:
Fix part metadata
Use 1759059
Check footprint dimensions
Thought
- Set Datasheet to "https://www.phoenixcontact.com/us/products/1759059/pdf"
