Review all available part information (MPN, package, pin count, description, properties). If no datasheet URL is already set, search the web for the official datasheet and update the part's Datasheet property with the URL. Then cross-check the schematic symbol, footprint, and pin descriptions against the datasheet. Summarize key specs and flag any mismatches.
I’ll review the part metadata, find and set the official datasheet URL if missing, then cross-check symbol, footprint, and pin descriptions against the datasheet and report mismatches.
Reviewed the part against the TI datasheet already attached in the Datasheet URL property; no datasheet update was needed.
Key result: the 8-ball DSBGA symbol pin mapping matches the datasheet, but I flagged issues with VSS being typed as Power Out, the X experimental-silicon MPN status, sparse pin descriptions, and possible footprint pad-size/unit ambiguity versus TI’s 0.35 mm pitch / 0.18 mm land pattern guidance.
A datasheet URL was already present, so I did not replace it. The attached document appears to be the TI MSPM0C1104/MSPM0C1103 datasheet, revision SLASF90D, revised January 2026.
Example board layout pad / metal diameter: 0.18 mm
Example solder mask opening: 0.18 mm
Preferred solder mask detail: solder-mask-defined
Example stencil aperture: 0.21 mm with 0.075 mm stencil
Observed Flux footprint:
Pad designators match the expected eight signals.
Relative ball map matches the datasheet when interpreted as rows A-D and columns 1-2:
A1 PA24, A2 PA0
B1 PA27, B2 PA1/NRST
C1 PA20, C2 VDD
D1 PA19, D2 VSS
Pad grid spacing is represented as 0.00035 in the layout data while the footprint declares units as mm. If Flux is displaying internal meter-like coordinates, this may correspond to 0.35 mm; if interpreted literally as millimeters, the footprint is scaled 1000× too small.
Pad size is represented as 0.0001524 with units mm. If interpreted literally, this is 0.0001524 mm, far smaller than the datasheet 0.18 mm land. If interpreted as meters, it is 0.1524 mm, still slightly smaller than the TI example 0.18 mm land and below the 0.16–0.20 mm ball diameter range midpoint.
Silkscreen/outline extents appear approximately ±0.4445 mm × ±0.7874 mm, consistent with about 0.889 mm × 1.575 mm, close to the datasheet E and D package dimensions.
Mismatches / issues flagged
VSS terminal type mismatch: VSS is set to Power Out; it should be a ground/power reference terminal, not an output. Recommended fix: set VSS pin type to a ground/passive/power type appropriate for Flux ERC.
Part is experimental silicon: MPN starts with X; datasheet states X devices are developmental and not recommended for production. Use production MSPM0C1104S8YCJR if this design is intended for manufacture.
Footprint unit ambiguity / possible scale issue: Layout pad positions and sizes are reported as 0.00035 pitch and 0.0001524 pad size with unit mm. This is inconsistent if interpreted literally. The outline looks correctly scaled, so this may be an internal unit/reporting artifact, but the pad geometry should be verified visually or by fabrication export.
Footprint pad diameter may be undersized: If the effective pad is 0.1524 mm, TI example land pattern uses 0.18 mm. Recommended fix: confirm the intended SMD/NSMD choice and adjust pad diameter to TI’s recommended 0.18 mm unless there is a fabrication-specific reason.
Pin descriptions are sparse: Symbol terminals only show primary names. Useful alternate functions such as PA19/SWDIO, PA20/SWCLK, ADC inputs, and I2C/SPI/UART capabilities are not captured as pin descriptions/properties.
Overall result
The schematic symbol pin count and primary ball-to-signal mapping match the TI datasheet. The main issues are the VSS pin type, the experimental X device status, sparse pin descriptions, and footprint pad-size/unit ambiguity that should be resolved before using this as a production-ready part.