I’ll audit the part metadata, find and set an official datasheet URL if missing, then compare symbol/footprint/pin details against the datasheet and report any mismatches.

Completed the part audit and saved the detailed report in part-audit-dcm3623t50t13a6t70.

Key findings: the pinout and 9-pad through-hole ChiP 3623 footprint generally match the Vicor datasheet; the Datasheet URL was already set, so I did not overwrite it. Main issues flagged are unspecified pin types/descriptions, missing explicit package metadata, output pin notation differences vs. datasheet prime notation, and the rounded 161 W description vs. 160 W / 160.8 W datasheet rating.

I’ll update each terminal’s Pin Type and Pin Description from the Vicor datasheet, then re-read the schematic to verify the metadata.

The first update applied, but Flux warned that several datasheet-style type labels are non-standard; I’m normalizing those to valid Flux pin types while keeping the datasheet descriptions exact.

Updated and verified all 9 terminal pin types and descriptions against the Vicor datasheet.

Power pins now use valid Flux types (Power In / Power Out), while the Pin Description fields preserve the datasheet functions for +IN, -IN, TR, EN, FT, +OUT, and -OUT.