Set the official Datasheet URL to the u-blox ANNA-B112 PDF and updated project metadata including Manufacturer Name, Package or Case Code, Operating Voltage, Operating Temperature, Connectivity, and a datasheet-aligned description
Verified the attached part assets and confirmed the footprint currently has 52 pads; I also reviewed the terminal set against the datasheet pin table and kept the part at 52 terminals including the exposed pads
Updated many terminal properties so the symbol better matches the datasheet, including Pin Description fields and corrected Pin Type values for ground, exposed-ground, RF, and crystal-related pins
✅ A valid official Datasheet URL is now set in the project properties
✅ Key datasheet metadata is reflected in the project: ANNA-B112, u-blox AG, BLE 5.0, 3.6 V max operating voltage, -40°C to +85°C, and SMD-52 package details
✅ The symbol-side terminal metadata was substantially synchronized to the datasheet, including descriptions and corrected pin types for the clearly defined pins
✅ The footprint was checked for 52 pads and the remaining asset mismatch was clearly flagged
✅ The remaining known discrepancy is documented for follow-up: footprint/symbol exposed-pad labels still use EXP while the datasheet names pins 49-52 as EGP
Next steps
If you want, I can do a second pass focused only on terminal organization properties like Section, Pin Group, and Sub-symbol Designator Suffix, or help you manually plan the asset-source cleanup for the EXP -> EGP naming mismatch.