I reviewed the current part project against the available project metadata, symbol terminals, and footprint pads.
Summary
Datasheet URL is already set, so I did not update it.
The part project currently has 16 schematic terminals but the footprint has 18 pads: 16 numbered pads plus 2 extra mount/shield pads. That is the biggest mismatch I found.
The symbol metadata is incomplete: all terminals have Pin Type = Unspecified, and I do not see any pin descriptions populated.
The project metadata has at least one likely classification problem: Part Type = Optoelectronic Devices does not match a MagJack / RJ45 connector with integrated magnetics.
Understandable, but messy and not ideal library metadata
Symbol / terminal audit
The schematic contains 16 terminal components, numbered 1–16. From the current symbol:
Pins 1–10 appear to be magnetics / channel pins
Pins 11–14 appear to be LED pins
Pins 15–16 exist as bare numeric labels
No terminal has a Pin Description
Every terminal has Pin Type = Unspecified
That kind of incomplete terminal metadata is exactly the sort of issue the part-sync workflow recommends flagging and fixing, especially pin count, pin types, and descriptions. The datasheet should be treated as the source of truth, and the pin count should match exactly, including extra pads when the datasheet counts them.
Footprint audit
The footprint contains:
16 main pads matching the symbol’s numbered electrical pins
2 additional pads inside the mounts container, labeled 17 and 18
That means the footprint has 18 total pads, while the symbol exposes only 16 terminals.
If pads 17 and 18 are mechanical shield / chassis / mount tabs and the datasheet treats them as pins, then the symbol is incomplete. The recommended rule for part verification is to make the project pin count match the datasheet exactly, including extra pads when listed.
2. Missing pin metadata
All terminals are currently missing the metadata normally expected in a validated part project:
Pin Type
Pin Description
The sync guidance explicitly calls for exact pin-number verification plus short pin descriptions and mapped pin types.
3. Poor / ambiguous terminal naming
A few terminal labels look weak for a library-quality part:
descriptive names exist for most signal pins
but pins 15 and 16 are just numeric labels
the label VCC(COMMON_CT_ looks truncated
Those are strong indicators the symbol likely needs cleanup against the datasheet pin table.
4. Part Type likely wrong
Optoelectronic Devices does not fit a 1-port RJ45 MagJack with integrated magnetics. This should more likely be categorized as a Connector. The part-sync guidance specifically says to correct project metadata when the functional category is wrong.
Key specs I could confirm
From the currently linked/discovered distributor metadata, this part appears to be:
1-port RJ45 connector
integrated magnetics
10/100/1000 Base-T
through-hole
rear LED version
8-position contact interface
I’m treating those as provisional because the linked PDF itself did not fully parse in-session, and the distributor/manufacturer attribution across search results is inconsistent.
What I would flag for correction
Table
Area
Status
Notes
Datasheet URL
OK
Already present, so no change needed
MPN
Likely OK
1840750-7
Manufacturer
Needs confirmation
Current value may be wrong or inherited from a distributor mapping
Part Type
Mismatch
Should likely be Connector
Description
Needs cleanup
Rewrite into a concise functional description
Package / Case Code
Missing
Should be populated from datasheet
Pin count
Mismatch
Symbol 16 vs footprint 18
Pin descriptions
Missing
Should be added for all pins
Pin types
Missing
All currently Unspecified
Terminal names
Partial mismatch
At least one truncated label and two non-descriptive labels
Recommended next step
I can clean this part project up for you by:
correcting the project metadata
adding or exposing the missing pads 17/18 in the symbol if appropriate
assigning Pin Type
adding Pin Description
fixing truncated or non-descriptive terminal names
Wirelessly connects nets on schematic. Used to organize schematics and separate functional blocks. To wirelessly connect net portals, give them same designator. #portal
General Purpose Thick Film Standard Power
and High-Power Chip Resistor
47 kOhms ±5% 0.125W, 1/8W Chip Resistor 0805 (2012 Metric) Automotive AEC-Q200 Thick Film
Features:
- RMCF – standard power ratings
- RMCP – high power ratings
- Nickel barrier terminations standard
- Power derating from 100% at 70ºC to zero at +155ºC
- RoHS compliant, REACH compliant, and halogen free
- AEC-Q200 compliant
• Low profile height, less than .400” off the PCB
• High speed capable, from 10/100BT up to 10GBT
• Can be used in low profile applications
• Can be used in half U height applications
• Compatible with up to OCP 3.0 mechanical card requirements
• Meets all IEEE 802.3 10/100Base-T thru 10GBase-T electrical requirements including RL, IL, Hi-pot and Common
Mode parameters
• 100% hi-pot tested in production
• Comes with many different LED color combinations and options
• 50 micro-inches of gold plated contacts as required by the TIA 1096/FCC 47, Part 68.
• Lead-free wave-solder compatible, with some IR reflow compatible designs
#CommonPartsLibrary#Connector