Refine this doc
Ask about this doc
STM32H573VIT7 Part Audit
Result
The part was audited against STMicroelectronics datasheet DS14121 Rev. 5 (May 2025) and ST's official STM32 open-pin database. The existing Datasheet URL is already an official ST URL, so no property update was required.
Metadata Review

Table


FieldCurrent / observedAssessment
MPNSTM32H573VIT7Correct
ManufacturerSTMicroelectronicsCorrect
DescriptionCortex-M33, TrustZone, FPU, 250 MHz, 2 MB Flash, 640 KB RAM, cryptographyConsistent
Terminal count100Correct
Footprint pad count100Correct
Datasheet URLOfficial ST URL aboveCorrect; already present
Package propertyNot populatedMissing; should identify LQFP100
Mount propertyNot populatedMissing; should be SMD
Logic FunctionANDIncorrect
Library subtypeLogicInadequate classification for an MCU
Ordering code interpretation: V = 100 pins, I = 2 MB Flash, T = LQFP, 7 = industrial -40 to +105 C, LDO supply configuration.
Key Specifications
  • Arm Cortex-M33 with TrustZone and FPU
  • Up to 250 MHz / 375 DMIPS
  • 2 MB dual-bank Flash with ECC
  • 640 KB SRAM plus 4 KB backup SRAM
  • Hardware cryptography including AES/SAES, PKA, HASH/SHA-512, and RNG
  • VDD operating range: 1.71 to 3.6 V
  • VDDUSB: 3.0 to 3.6 V
  • VBAT: 1.2 to 3.6 V
  • Temperature grade: -40 to +105 C
  • Package: LQFP100, 14 x 14 mm body, 0.50 mm pitch, no exposed pad
Pin and Symbol Cross-Check
All physical pins 1 through 100 exist exactly once in both the symbol and footprint. No duplicate or missing pin/pad numbers were found, and symbol-to-footprint mappings match ST's official pin database. Power and special pins are correctly numbered, including VDD, VSS, VCAP, VDDA/VSSA, VREF+/VREF-, VBAT, VDDUSB, NRST, BOOT0, HSE/LSE, and SWD/JTAG pins.
Symbol mismatches
  • All 100 terminals have Pin Type = Unspecified; power, ground, GPIO, reset, boot, and analog-reference electrical types are not classified.
  • Pin descriptions are absent for all terminals.
  • Pin Group, Section, Terminal Order, and explicit semantic Pin Orientation properties are absent.
  • Several special/debug aliases are shortened or omitted:
    • Pin 8: PC14-OSC32_IN / OSC32_IN
    • Pin 9: PC15-OSC32_OUT / OSC32_OUT
    • Pin 12: PH0-OSC_IN
    • Pin 13: PH1-OSC_OUT
    • Pin 72: PA13 / JTMS / SWDIO
    • Pin 76: PA14 / JTCK / SWCLK
    • Pin 77: PA15 / JTDI
    • Pin 89: PB3 / JTDO / TRACESWO
    • Pin 90: PB4 / NJTRST
  • GPIO alternate-function descriptions are not included. These omissions do not break physical pin mapping but reduce symbol clarity and ERC usefulness.
Footprint Cross-Check
Current footprint asset: QFP50P1600X1600X160-100N.kicad_mod.
Correct characteristics:
  • 100 SMD pads
  • 0.50 mm pitch
  • 0.30 mm pad width
  • 14 x 14 mm package body
  • Continuous perimeter numbering
  • Pin-1 marker present
  • No exposed pad, as expected
Footprint mismatch
ST's Figure 88 land-pattern example specifies approximately 0.30 x 1.20 mm pads, 16.7 x 16.7 mm outer land span, and 14.3 mm inner span. The current footprint uses 0.30 x 1.475 mm pads with a calculated outer span of about 16.951 mm. The pad length is therefore about 0.275 mm longer than ST's example, and the outer span is about 0.251 mm larger.
This should be reviewed before manufacturing. A longer toe/heel land may still be manufacturable, but it is not an exact match to ST's recommended example.
Assets
  • Footprint: QFP50P1600X1600X160-100N.kicad_mod
  • Symbol: STM32H573VIT7 Symbol.svg
  • 3D model: STM32H573VIT7.stp
The STEP model's exact dimensions and alignment could not be numerically verified from available metadata.
  1. Replace incorrect Logic Function = AND and classify the part as a microcontroller.
  2. Populate Package/Case as LQFP100 and Mount as SMD.
  3. Assign correct electrical Pin Types to all terminals.
  4. Add datasheet-derived pin descriptions and special/debug aliases.
  5. Add consistent Pin Group, Section, Pin Orientation, and Terminal Order metadata.
  6. Decide whether to revise the footprint to ST's 1.20 mm land length / 16.7 mm outer-span example or retain the current longer lands with an explicit manufacturing rationale.
  • Result

  • Metadata Review

  • Key Specifications

  • Pin and Symbol Cross-Check

  • Symbol mismatches

  • Footprint Cross-Check

  • Footprint mismatch

  • Assets

  • Recommended Corrections