Part Audit Review


I’ll review the part metadata and geometry, find and set the official datasheet URL if missing, then compare symbol/footprint/pin descriptions against the datasheet and report any mismatches.
I found the Datasheet URL already populated; I also found the official GCT product page and drawing PDF for cross-checking. I’m writing the review report now with the symbol/footprint findings and flagged cleanup items.
Created a project doc

MEM2090-00-145-00-A Part Review

View Document

Date: 2026-07-12 Reviewed the current published part project for GCT MEM2090-00-145-00-A against available part metadata, schematic terminal...
Completed the MEM2090 part audit and saved the detailed findings in MEM2090-00-145-00-A Part Review. The existing Datasheet URL was already populated, so I did not change it; I also found the official GCT product page/drawing links for verification.
Open items:
  • No fatal footprint or pin-number mismatch found.
  • Quality issues flagged: description typo “Normaly,” all pin types Unspecified, missing pin descriptions, ambiguous pin 9 COM, and generic shell ground naming.
Suggested next steps:
  1. Update pin descriptions and pin types.
  2. Rename or document pin 9 as the active-low card-detect switch contact.
  3. Rename shell pads 10–15 to SHELL_GND_* / SHIELD_GND_*.
  4. Optionally change the Datasheet URL to the official GCT drawing URL.
Fix and verify part
Fix part metadata
Rename ground pads
Update datasheet URL
Run final review

Name
Pin #
Type
Section
Pin Group
Orientation
Order
Sub-symbol
DAT2
1
Unspecified
CD/DAT3
2
Unspecified
CMD
3
Unspecified
VDD
4
Unspecified
CLK
5
Unspecified
VSS
6
Unspecified
DAT0
7
Unspecified
DAT1
8
Unspecified
COM
9
Unspecified
GROUND_1
10
Unspecified
GROUND_2
11
Unspecified
GROUND_3
12
Unspecified
GROUND_4
13
Unspecified
GROUND_5
14
Unspecified
GROUND_6
15
Unspecified

MEM2090-00-145-00-A