Part Review Audit
Worked for 3 mins 40 sec
The Datasheet URL is already set and points to Hongfa’s official download endpoint, so I’m leaving it unchanged. I found a key ordering-code nuance around the optional “without pin 6” field and am checking it against the existing 4-pad footprint before summarizing.
Worked for 9 mins 7 sec
Created a project doc
Part Review — HF105F-1/012D-1HST
Date: 2026-07-22 Project / part name: HF105F-1_012D-1HST
Reviewed the part and created the full report here: Part Review — HF105F-1/012D-1HST. The Datasheet URL was already set and confirmed as Hongfa’s official endpoint, so I did not change it.
Open items flagged:
- Pin descriptions/types are missing or generic.
- Library metadata has inconsistent classification facets.
- Package/body size is only in the description, not an explicit package property.
- Footprint geometry looks consistent, but drill-hole rules should be verified before manufacturing.
Suggested next steps:
- Update terminal descriptions and pin types.
- Clean up part type/package metadata.
- Verify THT drill sizes in the footprint: Ø1.1 mm coil holes and Ø2.1 mm contact holes.
Fix metadata issues
Update terminal descriptions
Clean part metadata
Verify drill sizes
Run part review
