Part Datasheet Review

flux

I’ll inspect the part metadata, find and set the official datasheet if missing, then compare symbol/footprint/pin descriptions against the datasheet and record the detailed review in a project file.

flux

I found the Datasheet URL was already populated, so I didn’t overwrite it. The cross-check is complete; I’m saving the detailed findings as a project file now.
Created a project doc

DSHP03TSGET Part Review

View Document
Date: 2026-07-20 Project: DSHP03TSGET

flux

Completed the DSHP03TSGET review and saved the full findings in DSHP03TSGET Part Review. The Datasheet URL was already set, so I did not overwrite it.
Open items:
  • Manufacturer naming is ambiguous across sources: current part says Dongguan Guangzhu Industrial, while JLC/LCSC list DongGuan KINGTEK / YE.
  • Package property is too generic: current DIP; datasheet/listing indicates SMD, P=1.27mm.
  • Pin descriptions are missing and pin types are Unspecified.
  • Footprint mostly matches, but pad dimensions/row span should be manually verified against the original drawing before production.
Suggested next steps:
  1. Update manufacturer/package metadata.
  2. Add pin descriptions and set switch terminals to Passive.
  3. Manually verify the land pattern against the original datasheet drawing or EasyEDA C50844 footprint.
Fix metadata and verify
Fix part metadata
Add pin descriptions
Verify footprint
Run review checks
Sign up to send

Files

Pins

Symbol

Layout

3D View

5
Pin Number
5
4
Pin Number
4
1
Pin Number
1
3
Pin Number
3
2
Pin Number
2
6
Pin Number
6
Name
Pin #
Type
Part Type
Terminal Order
1
1
Unspecified
Terminal
2
2
Unspecified
Terminal
3
3
Unspecified
Terminal
4
4
Unspecified
Terminal
5
5
Unspecified
Terminal
6
6
Unspecified
Terminal

DSHP03TSGET