Connector Part Review
Thought for 4 mins 4 sec
I found an existing Datasheet URL on the part-level metadata, so I’m not overwriting it; I also found TE’s official product page and customer drawing for verification. The footprint hole pattern matches the TE drawing on pin count, spacing, and drill range; I’m packaging the detailed findings into a short review file now.
Worked for 1 min 37 sec
Created a project doc
Part Information Review: TE Connectivity 3-213598-2
Date: 2026-07-23 Existing Flux part/project metadata and schematic/layout data.
Completed the part review and created Part Information Review: TE Connectivity 3-213598-2 with the detailed specs and cross-check results.
Open items:
- Datasheet URL was already set, so I did not overwrite it; the report records the direct official TE product drawing URL.
- Main issues flagged: missing pin descriptions,
Unspecifiedpin types, and unverified pad land diameter from the accessible drawing extraction.
Suggested next steps:
- Add pin descriptions for the two active contacts and grounding contact.
- Set terminal pin types appropriately for a power connector.
- Optionally update the Datasheet URL to TE’s direct product drawing URL.
Fix pins and datasheet
Add pin descriptions
Set pin types
Update datasheet URL
Verify footprint geometry
