Chat

Welcome to Flux

Treat Flux like your intern. Tell it what you'd like to build and it'll get to work. You can also ask it questions, brainstorm ideas, and teach it your preferences. Learn More

Explain project
Write a project description
Find schematic issues
Create a test plan
Simulate a circuit
Prepare for Manufacturing
Component Selection Workflow
New Subsystem Wizard
Write I2C initialization code
Generate firmware skeleton
Generate a markdown-formatted table to compare U4. Highlight the main difference...
rydy

rydy

@copilot Generate a markdown-formatted table to compare U4. Highlight the main differences between them. I am especially interested in the electrical differences (maximum ratings, input and output voltages, currents, etc), pinout differences, tolerances, and main features.
2y

copilot

To generate a comparison between LM1117MPX-3.3/NOPB (which I assume you're referring to as U4) and its alternatives, notably the TLV1117 and TLV761 which were mentioned as newer alternatives or for improved functionality, I'll draw upon the information available in the datasheets and my general knowledge. Note that I don't have direct excerpts from the datasheets of the TLV1117 and TLV761, so the comparisons will be based on standard specifications for these parts from Texas Instruments, as per the context provided by the LM1117MPX-3.3/NOPB datasheet excerpt[1].

Table

FeatureLM1117MPX-3.3/NOPBTLV1117TLV761
Output Voltage (Fixed Versions)1.8V, 2.5V, 3.3V, 5V1.25V to 13.8V (adjustable & fixed)1.8V, 2.5V, 3.3V, 5V (fixed versions)
Output Current800 mA800 mA150 mA
Dropout VoltageTypically varies with load, ∼\sim1.2V at full loadLower dropout compared to LM1117Ultra-low dropout
PackagesSOT-223, TO-220, WSON, TO-252Similar, includes SOT-223, TO-220SOT-23 exclusively
Adjustable Version Output Voltage Range1.25V to 13.8V (for the adjustable version)1.25V to 13.8VNot specified, likely similar
Main FeaturesLow dropout, space-saving packagesImproved drop-in replacement, better thermal performanceSupports low power consumption
Key Differences:
  • Dropout Voltage: The TLV1117 and TLV761 are expected to have a lower dropout voltage compared to the LM1117, making them more efficient for applications where input and output voltage differentials are small.
  • Output Current: The LM1117 and TLV1117 support up to 800 mA, which is significantly higher than the 150 mA supported by the TLV761. This makes the TLV761 less suitable for applications requiring higher current.
  • Package Options: The LM1117 is available in a wider variety of packages, including WSON for space-constrained applications, compared to the more limited TLV761 offering.
  • Main Features: Each of these regulators brings its own advantages to the table. The LM1117 is known for its reliability and wide availability. The TLV1117 is highlighted for better thermal performance and can be a direct improved replacement for LM1117 in many cases. The TLV761, on the other hand, is ideal for low power applications due to its ultra-low dropout feature.
Remember to review the specific datasheet of each component variant you consider for your application, as manufacturers might update specifications or introduce new features over time. This comparison is based on typical values and general features; actual performance will depend on specific conditions and application requirements.
[1] Page 1
2y
2
U2
R1
Resistance
10kΩ
D1
J1
U4
5v
5v
U5
5v
R2
Resistance
36 Ω
5v
5v
R3
Resistance
5 kΩ
Q1
End of Life
OLED1
U3
R4
Resistance
10kΩ
U1
J2

No files yet

Documents

    Documents are markdown text files which describe project goals, capture details, or even simulation outputs.

    Assets

    No assets added.

    Horrible Azure Flying Cab

    Horrible Azure Flying Cab thumbnail
    Welcome to your new project. Imagine what you can build here.

    Properties

    Properties describe core aspects of the project.

    Pricing & Availability

    Distributor

    Qty 1

    Digi-Key

    $19.24–$20.56

    LCSC

    $9.97–$10.09

    Mouser

    $4.67–$5.05

    Controls