Fixing PCB Routing Errors
The "Airwires" review flagged a error on Trace 6b4d:Trace 6b4d, U2:VM.
Reports missing routed traces between pads in a net.
Designators: Trace 6b4d:Trace 6b4d, U2:VM; Net: 3V3
Context: Reports missing routed traces between pads in a net.
Help me fix this.
0:50
Thought for 5 sec
Running design checks.
Read schematic.
Read layout.
Read layout.
Search docs: How does a user fix Airwires review errors by routing missing traces or using Auto-Route in Flux PCB layout?.
Thought for a moment
I checked it: U2:VM is correctly on the 3V3 schematic net, so this is a PCB routing issue, not a schematic connectivity issue. The Airwires review means the 3V3 copper route is incomplete; route the missing 3V3 connection to U2:VM or run Flux Auto-Layout, which the docs describe as automatically routing the design: “Auto-Layout leverages Flux's AI to handle the time-intensive task of routing your PCB.” Source
I can’t manually draw that trace for you, but the specific fix is to complete the 3V3 route segment into U2:VM and then re-check the Airwires review.
Review 3V3 airwires
Locate U2 VM
Check 3V3 routing
Identify trace endpoints
Finished working
Refine this doc
Ask about this doc
Project Specification
Design Summary
Status: Draft / Review / Approved
Manufacturing target: Prototype / EVT / DVT / PVT / Production
Software / firmware: repository link
Scope
Purpose
In scope
Out of scope
System context
Requirements
Functional
Electrical
Mechanical / environmental
Key constraints
Dependencies and risks
Dependencies
Key risks
Validation
Success criteria
Planned checks
Release-facing notes
Expected deliverables
Special release notes
Change notes / open questions
Changes in this revision
Open questions
Welcome 👋
Flux helps you build PCBs faster with an AI teammate!
Create your account to collaborate, stay updated, fork your own version, and get instant answers from our AI agent.