Review all available part information (MPN, package, pin count, description, properties). If no datasheet URL is already set, search the web for the official datasheet and update the part's Datasheet property with the URL. Then cross-check the schematic symbol, footprint, and pin descriptions against the datasheet. Summarize key specs and flag any mismatches.
I’ll audit this part project’s existing metadata, symbol terminals, footprint/pads, and datasheet status; if the datasheet URL is missing, I’ll find the official TDK datasheet, update the part property, then compare pins/mechanics/specs and report mismatches.
I found this is a 2-terminal part project with a KiCad footprint and STEP model already attached, but no BOM entry or visible part-level datasheet property in the schematic view. I’m checking TDK’s official source now.
Audit complete. I set the official TDK datasheet URL, confirmed the 2-terminal passive symbol and SMD footprint match the datasheet land pattern/body outline, and created the full report here: Part Datasheet Audit.
Key issue flagged: one generated library description mentions 6.4 mm height, but the TDK datasheet specifies 5.4 mm max. The project review is now clean after adding the audit documentation.