For this audit, I followed the part-project sync rule that the datasheet is the source of truth and that the terminal count must match exactly, including for simple 2-pin passives
SummaryProject metadata status
Table
Field
Current status
Result
MPN
RC0603FR-0747KL
Looks correct
Manufacturer
Yageo
Looks correct
Designator Prefix
R
Correct for resistor
Package / Case Code
R0603
Plausible, but not normalized to the more common 0603 (1608 Metric) style
Datasheet URL
Was missing
Updated to official Yageo URL
Description
YAGEO
Too weak / not descriptive
Key specs found
From the official Yageo search result and distributor summaries for this exact MPN:
Table
Spec
Value
Resistance
47 kOhm
Tolerance
±1%
Power rating
0.1 W (1/10 W) @ 70 C
Tempco
±100 ppm/C
Temperature range
-55 C to +155 C
Package
0603 (1608 Metric)
Working voltage
Likely 75 V based on distributor listing for this exact part
Symbol / pin cross-check
Current symbol state:
There are 2 terminals
Terminal pin numbers are 1 and 2
Both terminals are typed Passive
For a 2-terminal chip resistor, that is exactly what I would expect, and it is consistent with the usual datasheet representation for this class of part. The part-project sync guidance also treats simple passives differently from IC-style parts, so extra section/grouping metadata is not required here
Pin description check
I do not see Pin Description properties on the two terminals.
That is not electrically wrong, but it means the part is incomplete from a documentation standpoint.
Recommended descriptions would be simple and symmetric, such as:
Pin 1: Resistor terminal
Pin 2: Resistor terminal
Footprint cross-check
What I can confirm from the current footprint:
The footprint has 2 pads, which is correct.
It is clearly set up as a 2-terminal SMD resistor footprint.
The package metadata says R0603, which aligns with a 0603 resistor package.
What I could not fully verify from the available tool output:
Exact pad dimensions
Pad spacing
Body outline dimensions against Yageo’s recommended land pattern
The reason is that the layout tool exposed the presence of the pads and footprint containers, but not their geometric dimensions in the returned result. The web scrape for the full datasheet details timed out, so I could not complete a numerical land-pattern comparison.
Mismatches and issues flaggedConfirmed issues
Table
Area
Issue
Severity
Description
Project description is just YAGEO instead of a useful functional summary
Medium
Datasheet property
Was missing before review
Fixed
Pin descriptions
Not populated on either terminal
Low
Package naming
R0603 is usable, but less explicit than 0603 (1608 Metric)
Low
No mismatch found
Table
Area
Result
Pin count
2 pins present, which is correct for this resistor
Pin numbering
1, 2 present and sensible
Pin type
Both Passive, which is correct
Basic footprint topology
2-pad SMD footprint, consistent with a chip resistor
Normalize / improve package metadata if you want a more explicit package label
Continue with a stricter footprint audit once we have a fully parsed Yageo datasheet/land-pattern source
Overall: the part project looks mostly correct structurally, and the only concrete fix I needed to apply was the missing datasheet URL. The main remaining gaps are descriptive metadata and terminal descriptions, not the electrical structure.
Wirelessly connects nets on schematic. Used to organize schematics and separate functional blocks. To wirelessly connect net portals, give them same designator. #portal
General Purpose Thick Film Standard Power
and High-Power Chip Resistor
47 kOhms ±5% 0.125W, 1/8W Chip Resistor 0805 (2012 Metric) Automotive AEC-Q200 Thick Film
Features:
- RMCF – standard power ratings
- RMCP – high power ratings
- Nickel barrier terminations standard
- Power derating from 100% at 70ºC to zero at +155ºC
- RoHS compliant, REACH compliant, and halogen free
- AEC-Q200 compliant