Part Datasheet Review and Update
Thought for 2 mins 21 sec
I reviewed the part project and found one change I can take care of now: setting the missing
Datasheet URL property to the official Hirose source. The project currently has Manufacturer Part Number = FH34SRJ-20S-0.5SH_50_, Manufacturer Name = HRS, and Designator Prefix = J, and it does not have a Datasheet URL property yetHere’s the audit summary so far:
Current part info in the project
Table
| Field | Current value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer Part Number | FH34SRJ-20S-0.5SH_50_ | Likely formatting mismatch vs official FH34SRJ-20S-0.5SH(50) |
| Manufacturer Name | HRS | Abbreviated; official source uses Hirose / HIROSE Electric Group |
| Designator Prefix | J | Correct for a connector |
| Datasheet URL | Missing | Can be added |
- The schematic contains 22 terminals total: pins 1-20 plus 2 shield terminals (
S1,S2) represented as separate terminals. - All terminals are currently typed as Passive, which is reasonable for an FFC/FPC connector.
- The project follows the key rule that pin counts must match the datasheet and include special pads when present
- The footprint contains pads for 1-20 plus S1 and S2, so the footprint pad set matches the schematic terminal set.
- The footprint asset and STEP model are present in the project.
- From the footprint data, the pad naming is internally consistent with the symbol: no missing or extra pads were found.
- Part: FH34SRJ-20S-0.5SH(50)
- Series: FH34
- Type: FFC/FPC connector
- Positions: 20
- Pitch: 0.5 mm
- Height: 1.0 mm
- Contact style: top and bottom contact
- Actuation style: back flip
- Lifecycle: discontinued, with a Hirose replacement page listed in search results
Table
| Item | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| MPN formatting | Flag | Project uses FH34SRJ-20S-0.5SH_50_; official naming appears to use FH34SRJ-20S-0.5SH(50) |
| Manufacturer name | Flag | HRS is abbreviated; official naming is Hirose / HIROSE Electric Group |
| Datasheet URL | Mismatch | Missing entirely |
| Pin count | OK | 20 signal + 2 shield terminals present |
| Symbol vs footprint pad mapping | OK | Terminal set matches pad set |
| Pin descriptions | Incomplete | No pin descriptions are set on the terminals |
| Package / case property | Missing | Not currently present in project properties |
I could verify the terminal count and the symbol-to-footprint pad correspondence, but I could not fully cross-check per-pin descriptions against an official readable datasheet extract yet. For this connector family, that mostly affects descriptive fields like contact/shield naming rather than electrical pin-function complexity. The part-project sync guidance says pin numbers must come from the datasheet and missing descriptions should be flagged rather than guessed
If you want, I can set the missing
Datasheet URL next using the official Hirose source I found.
Welcome 👋
Flux accelerates your PCB design with AI.
Create your account to start using this component and bring your ideas to life.