Part Data Review and Validation

flux

I reviewed the available part data, checked the part project structure, searched for an official datasheet, and updated the project’s Datasheet property to the official TDK PDF: Datasheet.
Part information review

Table

FieldCurrent / Verified ValueStatus
Manufacturer Part NumberC2012X7S1E106K125AEOK
ManufacturerTDKOK in project properties, but pricing metadata appears inconsistent
Description10 µF ±10% 25 V Ceramic Capacitor X7S 0805 (2012 Metric)Matches datasheet/product info
Part TypeCapacitorsOK
Designator PrefixCOK
Capacitance10 µFOK
Tolerance±10%OK
Rated Voltage25 VdcOK
DielectricX7SOK
Package0805 / 2012 MetricMatches datasheet naming
Pin count2OK
Key specs from the official TDK datasheet

Table

SpecValue
Capacitance10 µF
Tolerance±10%
Rated voltage25 Vdc
Temperature characteristicX7S
Operating temperature-55 °C to +125 °C
Capacitance change over temperature±22%
PackageC2012 / EIA 0805
TerminationSoft termination
Length L2.00 mm (+0.45 / -0.20)
Width W1.25 mm (+0.25 / -0.20)
Thickness T1.25 mm (+0.25 / -0.20)
Terminal width B0.20 mm min
Terminal gap G0.50 mm min
Symbol and pin review

Table

ItemFindingStatus
Schematic symbolTwo passive terminals present: ~ and ~OK
Pin numberingPins are numbered 1 and 2OK
Pin typeBoth set to PassiveOK
Pin descriptionsNo pin descriptions are definedAcceptable for an MLCC, but could be improved
Pin names vs datasheetDatasheet does not define polarized/electrical names, only mechanical dimensionsNo mismatch
Footprint review

Table

ItemFindingStatus
Pad count2 pads presentOK
Symbol-to-footprint count2 symbol terminals / 2 footprint padsOK
Polarization expectationsNone required for this non-polarized capacitorOK
Pad geometry / land patternNot fully exposed by current project data toolsNot fully verifiable here
Mismatches / flags

Table

IssueDetailsSeverity
Pricing metadata manufacturer fieldProject pricing block shows manufacturer as C2012X7S1E106K125AE instead of TDKMinor metadata mismatch
No explicit package propertyPackage is evident from description/datasheet, but I do not see a dedicated package property like Package or Package CodeMinor completeness issue
No pin descriptionsNot wrong for a 2-terminal MLCC, but descriptions are blankMinor
Footprint dimensions not fully inspectableI could verify pad count alignment, but not exact pad size/spacing against TDK land pattern from the current returned layout dataNeeds manual/visual confirmation if you want full geometric signoff
Bottom line
  • The core part data looks correct for this TDK capacitor.
  • I updated the Datasheet property to the official TDK datasheet PDF.
  • The symbol is consistent with the part: 2 passive pins, numbered 1 and 2.
  • The footprint structure is directionally correct: 2 pads for a 2-terminal MLCC.
  • The main issues are metadata completeness, plus the fact that exact footprint land-pattern dimensions were not fully inspectable through the available layout output.
If you want, I can do a second pass focused specifically on footprint geometry validation and compare the pad dimensions/spacing against the recommended TDK land pattern.
Fix all mismatches
Check critical parts first
Update missing datasheets
Create review note
Sign up to send

Files

Pins

Symbol

Layout

3D View

Name
Pin #
Type
Section
Pin Group
Orientation
Order
Sub-symbol
~
1
Passive
~
2
Passive

C2012X7S1E106K125AE